Mattermost ServerApplication · Mattermost

CVE-2020-14459

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-06-19
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.19.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in Mattermost Server before 5.19.0. Attackers can rename a channel and cause a collision with a direct message, aka MMSA-2020-0002.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In Mattermost Server before version 5.19.0, an authorization flaw allows authenticated attackers to rename a channel to match the name of an existing direct message conversation. This creates a naming collision that can lead to unauthorized access or manipulation of direct message channels, likely due to improper validation of channel name uniqueness across different channel types.

MitigationUpgrade Mattermost Server to version 5.19.0 or later to obtain the patch for this authorization bypass vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Mattermost ServerApplication
Affected:< 5.19.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine Mattermost Server version
    Run 'mattermost version' from the server command line, or check the system console under About > Mattermost Version, or inspect the /opt/mattermost/version.txt file
    Affected if The installed version is any version prior to 5.19.0 (e.g., 5.18.x, 5.17.x, etc.)
  2. Verify channel naming collision opportunity
    As an authenticated user with channel management permissions, attempt to rename an existing public or private channel to match the name of an existing direct message conversation in the system. Use the channel settings to rename and observe if the operation completes without error.
    Affected if The server allows renaming a channel to duplicate the name of an existing direct message channel, indicating the uniqueness validation is missing
  3. Review audit logs for channel rename operations
    Access Mattermost Audit Logs (System Console > Audit Logs) and search for events where channel_name was modified. Look for multiple entries where channels were renamed to identical names across different channel types.
    Affected if Audit logs show channels renamed to names that already exist as direct message conversations, suggesting the vulnerability was exploited
  4. Check for unexpected direct message access
    Review system logs and database records in the Channels table for entries where Type indicates DM (direct message) but the Name field matches that of a public/private channel
    Affected if Database contains channel name collisions between direct messages and regular channels, indicating the flaw exists or was exploited

A user is affected if their Mattermost Server version is below 5.19.0 AND the server permits renaming channels to duplicate existing direct message conversation names.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.19.0 or later
Fixed in 5.19.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Mattermost Server to version 5.19.0 or later to obtain the patch for this authorization bypass vulnerability.

Fix this in Mattermost Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,380
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-14459 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-14459 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data