Openclinic GaApplication · Openclinic Ga Project

CVE-2020-14490

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-07-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
OpenClinic GA 5.09.02 and 5.89.05b includes arbitrary local files specified within its parameter and executes some files, which may allow disclosure of sensitive files or the execution of malicious uploaded files.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

OpenClinic GA versions 5.09.02 and 5.89.05b contain a file inclusion vulnerability where arbitrary local files can be specified via a parameter and subsequently executed. This Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability can be chained with uploaded malicious files to achieve remote code execution, potentially allowing attackers to read sensitive system files (like /etc/passwd or configuration files) or execute arbitrary code on the server.

MitigationUpgrade OpenClinic GA to a patched version that properly validates and sanitizes file inclusion parameters, or implement input validation/allowlist controls to prevent path traversal and unauthorized file inclusion. Web application firewall (WAF) rules can provide interim protection.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Openclinic GaApplication
Affected:= 5.09.02= 5.89.05b

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify OpenClinic GA installation
    Locate the OpenClinic GA web application directory (commonly in web server document roots such as /var/www/html/, /opt/tomcat/webapps/, or C:\inetpub\wwwroot\ depending on your OS). Look for the openclinic directory or files containing 'openclinic' in the name.
    Affected if OpenClinic GA is present on the server in a web-accessible directory.
  2. Determine installed version
    Check the version file or banner within the OpenClinic GA installation. Common locations include a version.txt, README file, or the admin/about page within the web interface.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 5.09.02 or exactly 5.89.05b.
  3. Identify vulnerable file inclusion parameter
    Review the application's PHP source files for parameters that accept file paths without proper sanitization. Look for functions like include(), require(), file_get_contents(), or similar that use user-supplied input without validation.
    Affected if The application uses a parameter to specify files that can be controlled via user input and lacks proper path validation.
  4. Verify web server exposure
    Check your web server configuration (Apache, Nginx, IIS, or Tomcat) to determine if the OpenClinic GA application is accessible from the network (public IP or internal network).
    Affected if The vulnerable OpenClinic GA instance is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS from network locations.
  5. Check for path traversal protection
    Inspect the code handling file inclusion parameters for validation logic. Look for allowlists, removal of '../' sequences, or restriction to specific directories.
    Affected if No input validation exists or path traversal sequences (../) are not blocked, allowing access outside the intended directory.

You are affected if OpenClinic GA versions 5.09.02 or 5.89.05b are installed and accessible via web, with a file inclusion parameter that lacks proper input validation to prevent path traversal.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade OpenClinic GA to a patched version that properly validates and sanitizes file inclusion parameters, or implement input validation/allowlist controls to prevent path traversal and unauthorized file inclusion. Web application firewall (WAF) rules can provide interim protection.

Fix this in Openclinic Ga Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-14490 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-14490 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data