CVE-2020-14497
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdvantech iView, versions 5.6 and prior, contains multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities that are vulnerable to the use of an attacker-controlled string in the construction of SQL queries. An attacker could extract user credentials, read or modify information, and remotely execute code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAdvantech iView versions 5.6 and prior contains multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities where attacker-controlled strings are directly incorporated into SQL query construction. This allows attackers to manipulate database queries, extract user credentials, read or modify sensitive information, and potentially achieve remote code execution through database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 5.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Advantech iView installationLocate the iView application on the system - check for the web application directory or installed software listingAffected if Advantech iView is present on the system
-
Determine installed versionAccess the application admin interface or check version files within the iView installation directory; compare the version number to 5.6Affected if The installed version is 5.6 or any version lower than 5.6
-
Identify web interface exposureCheck if the iView web application is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS - typically on common web portsAffected if The iView web interface is exposed and reachable on the network
-
Assess network accessibilityDetermine if the application is accessible from untrusted networks or the internet by reviewing firewall rules and network configurationAffected if The application is reachable from untrusted networks without proper access controls
A system is affected if Advantech iView version 5.6 or lower is installed and the web interface is network-accessible, allowing attackers to inject malicious SQL through exposed parameters.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade iView to a version newer than 5.6. If no patched version is available, implement parameterized queries/prepared statements across all database interactions, apply input validation, and restrict network access to the application while implementing web application firewall rules.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $13,440.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-14497 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- us-cert.cisa.gov
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- www.zerodayinitiative.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-14497 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data