Da 70254 FirmwareOperating system · Digitus

CVE-2020-15062

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-08-07
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
93/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
DIGITUS DA-70254 4-Port Gigabit Network Hub 2.073.000.E0008 devices allow an attacker on the same network to elevate privileges because the administrative password can be discovered by sniffing unencrypted UDP traffic.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The DIGITUS DA-70254 4-Port Gigabit Network Hub transmits administrative credentials in unencrypted UDP packets on the local network. An attacker with network proximity can sniff these packets to discover the admin password and gain elevated privileges.

MitigationReplace the device with a secure alternative that supports encrypted management protocols (HTTPS, SSH), or implement network segmentation to isolate the device and restrict access to trusted personnel only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Da 70254 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 2.073.000.e0008

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device model
    Locate the device physically or check its web administration interface for the model number. The affected device is the DIGITUS DA-70254 4-Port Gigabit Network Hub.
    Affected if The device model is not Digitus DA-70254 (the vulnerability does not apply to other devices)
  2. Check the firmware version
    Access the device's web-based administration panel or check the device documentation/label for the firmware version. Look for a version string such as 2.073.000.e0008.
    Affected if The firmware version matches exactly 2.073.000.e0008 (this is the only affected version per the provided data)
  3. Verify UDP traffic contains administrative credentials
    Use a network packet capture tool (such as Wireshark or tcpdump) on the same local network segment as the device. Monitor UDP packets transmitted by the device. Look for plaintext administrative usernames and passwords in the packet payload.
    Affected if Administrative credentials (username/password) are visible in plaintext within UDP packets transmitted by the device
  4. Confirm admin interface accessibility
    Check if the device's web management interface is accessible over HTTP (port 80) rather than only over HTTPS or other encrypted protocols.
    Affected if The admin interface is accessible over unencrypted HTTP

You are affected if you have a Digitus DA-70254 device running firmware version 2.073.000.e0008 and administrative credentials can be observed in plaintext UDP traffic on your local network.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace the device with a secure alternative that supports encrypted management protocols (HTTPS, SSH), or implement network segmentation to isolate the device and restrict access to trusted personnel only.

Fix this in Da 70254 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,690
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-15062 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-15062 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data