PrestoApplication · Prestosql

CVE-2020-15087

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-06-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 337 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In Presto before version 337, authenticated users can bypass authorization checks by directly accessing internal APIs. This impacts Presto server installations with secure internal communication configured. This does not affect installations that have not configured secure internal communication, as these installations are inherently insecure. This only affects Presto server installations. This does NOT affect clients such as the CLI or JDBC driver. This vulnerability has been fixed in version 337. Additionally, this issue can be mitigated by blocking network access to internal APIs on the coordinator and workers.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In Presto before version 337, authenticated users can bypass authorization checks by directly accessing internal APIs, which should be restricted to internal communication only. This allows privilege escalation on installations with secure internal communication configured.

MitigationUpgrade Presto to version 337 or later, or block network access to internal APIs on both coordinator and workers via firewall rules or network policies.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PrestoApplication
Affected:< 337

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed Presto version
    Run 'presto-server --version' or check the version file in the Presto installation directory, or query the Presto coordinator's /v1/info endpoint
    Affected if The version is lower than 337 (e.g., 336, 335, etc.)
  2. Identify internal API endpoints configuration
    Examine Presto configuration files (config.properties) for 'http-server.http.port', 'http-server.https.port', and any 'internal-communication' related settings
    Affected if HTTP/HTTPS ports are exposed externally or internal communication is configured without proper network restrictions
  3. Verify authentication is enabled
    Check config.properties for 'authentication.type' setting (e.g., password, kerberos, jwt)
    Affected if Authentication is configured (indicating the internal API could be accessed by authenticated users)
  4. Test internal API accessibility
    Attempt to access internal-only endpoints such as /v1/cluster, /v1/query, or worker-to-worker APIs from an external network location using valid credentials
    Affected if Internal APIs are reachable from outside the trusted network and accept authenticated requests
  5. Check authorization model configuration
    Review access control configuration files (access-control.properties) and any defined rules for internal API paths
    Affected if Authorization rules exist but do not explicitly deny access to internal API endpoints for authenticated users

The environment is affected if Presto version is below 337 AND internal API endpoints are network-accessible to authenticated users, allowing privilege escalation through authorization bypass.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 337 or later
Fixed in 337
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Presto to version 337 or later, or block network access to internal APIs on both coordinator and workers via firewall rules or network policies.

Fix this in Presto Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-15087 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-15087 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data