SannavApplication · Broadcom

CVE-2020-15381

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-06-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.1.1 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Brocade SANnav before version 2.1.1 contains an Improper Authentication vulnerability that allows cleartext transmission of authentication credentials of the jmx server.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Brocade SANnav versions before 2.1.1 contain an Improper Authentication vulnerability in the jmx server component where authentication credentials are transmitted in cleartext, enabling credential interception through network sniffing or man-in-the-middle attacks.

MitigationUpgrade Brocade SANnav to version 2.1.1 or later to implement proper encryption for jmx server authentication credentials.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SannavApplication
Affected:< 2.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify SANnav installation and version
    Locate the SANnav installation directory or use system inventory tools to find the installed version of Brocade/Broadcom SANnav. Common methods include checking /opt/sannav or using 'rpm -q' or 'dpkg -l' commands if installed via package manager.
    Affected if The installed version is found to be lower than 2.1.1
  2. Confirm jmx server is enabled
    Check SANnav configuration files or running services to determine if the jmx server component is active. This may involve reviewing process listings, service configurations, or management console settings.
    Affected if The jmx server component is running and accessible on the network
  3. Verify network exposure of jmx port
    Identify the jmx server port (commonly port 8080 or 8443 for management interfaces) using netstat or similar network scanning tools. Determine if the port is listening on external interfaces rather than localhost only.
    Affected if The jmx port is exposed to network segments where untrusted users could intercept traffic
  4. Capture network traffic to jmx server
    Use packet capture tools (tcpdump, Wireshark) to capture traffic flowing to the jmx server port during authentication. Analyze the capture to check if credentials appear in plaintext within the network packets.
    Affected if Authentication credentials are observed in cleartext within captured network traffic
  5. Review jmx server authentication configuration
    Examine SANnav configuration files related to jmx authentication settings. Look for transport configuration that specifies whether SSL/TLS encryption is enabled for the jmx connector.
    Affected if SSL/TLS encryption is not enabled or is explicitly disabled for jmx authentication

You are affected if SANnav version is below 2.1.1 AND the jmx server is accessible over the network with cleartext authentication enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.1.1 or later
Fixed in 2.1.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Brocade SANnav to version 2.1.1 or later to implement proper encryption for jmx server authentication credentials.

Fix this in Sannav Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-15381 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-15381 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data