CVE-2020-15673
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMozilla developers reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 80 and Firefox ESR 78.2. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 81, Thunderbird < 78.3, and Firefox ESR < 78.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMemory safety bugs in Firefox 80 and Firefox ESR 78.2 allowed memory corruption that could potentially be exploited to achieve arbitrary code execution. This affects Firefox versions prior to 81, Thunderbird prior to 78.3, and Firefox ESR prior to 78.3.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 81.0< 78.3= 9.0= 10.0< 78.3= 15.1= 15.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Mozilla productCheck which Mozilla application is installed: run 'which firefox', 'which thunderbird', or look for Firefox ESR in your package managerAffected if Any of Firefox, Firefox ESR, or Thunderbird is installed
-
Check Firefox versionRun 'firefox --version' or navigate to 'about:support' in Firefox and check the version number in the Application Basics sectionAffected if The version is less than 81.0 (for example, 80.x or earlier)
-
Check Firefox ESR versionRun 'firefox --version' on an ESR installation or check via 'about:support', noting the ESR identifier in the version stringAffected if The version is less than 78.3 (for example, 78.2 or earlier)
-
Check Thunderbird versionRun 'thunderbird --version' or navigate to 'about:support' in ThunderbirdAffected if The version is less than 78.3 (for example, 78.2 or earlier)
-
Check system package version on Debian or OpenSUSEOn Debian run 'dpkg -l | grep -i firefox' or 'dpkg -l | grep -i thunderbird'; on OpenSUSE run 'rpm -qa | grep -i firefox' or 'rpm -qa | grep -i thunderbird'Affected if The installed package version is older than the fixed versions (81.0 for Firefox, 78.3 for Thunderbird/ESR)
You are affected if any installed Mozilla browser or email client (Firefox, Firefox ESR, or Thunderbird) has a version number lower than 81.0 for Firefox or 78.3 for Thunderbird/ESR.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data78.381.0
Update affected Mozilla products (Firefox, Thunderbird, Firefox ESR) to version 81, 78.3, or later respectively, or apply the latest security patches via the vendor's update mechanism.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,456.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-15673 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-15673 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data