CVE-2020-15828
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn JetBrains TeamCity before 2020.1.1, project parameter values can be retrieved by a user without appropriate permissions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn JetBrains TeamCity before version 2020.1.1, an authorization flaw allows users to retrieve project parameter values (which may contain sensitive information like API keys, credentials, or secrets) without having the appropriate permissions, leading to information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2020.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify TeamCity installationCheck if TeamCity is running by looking for the process (teamcity-server, teamcity) or by accessing the web UI on the default port (typically 8111)Affected if TeamCity is not found or not accessible on expected ports
-
Determine installed TeamCity versionAccess the TeamCity web interface and navigate to the 'About' page (typically at /about.html) or check the version.txt file in the TeamCity data directoryAffected if The version cannot be determined or the TeamCity instance is not accessible
-
Compare version against vulnerable rangeCompare the installed version number to 2020.1.1 - versions below this (e.g., 2020.1, 2019.x, 2018.x, etc.) are affectedAffected if Installed version is less than 2020.1.1 (for example, 2020.1.0, 2019.2.2, 2019.1.4, etc.)
-
Verify parameter access authorization (optional)As a user with limited permissions, attempt to access project parameters via the API endpoint /app/rest/projects/<projectId>/parameters or through the web UI settingsAffected if A user without 'View project parameters' permission can retrieve sensitive parameter values
You are affected if your TeamCity installation version is less than 2020.1.1 and users without proper permissions can access project parameter values.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data2020.1.1
Upgrade TeamCity to version 2020.1.1 or later to address the unauthorized parameter access vulnerability.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-15828 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-15828 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data