CVE-2020-15830
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJetBrains TeamCity before 2019.2.3 is vulnerable to stored XSS in the administration UI.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceStored XSS vulnerability in the administration UI of JetBrains TeamCity versions before 2019.2.3 allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that executes when administrators view the affected interface elements.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2019.2.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify TeamCity version from web interfaceLog into TeamCity as an administrator and navigate to the Administration > Global Settings page. The current version is displayed at the top of this page.Affected if The displayed version number is lower than 2019.2.3 (for example, 2019.2.2, 2019.2.1, 2019.1.x, etc.)
-
Identify TeamCity version from logsCheck the teamcity-server.log file located in the <TeamCity_home>/logs directory for a line containing 'TeamCity version' near the start of the file.Affected if The logged version is lower than 2019.2.3
-
Identify TeamCity version from configurationInspect the version.xml file in the <TeamCity_home>/webapps/TeamCity/WEB-INF directory or check the build.properties file in the TeamCity data directory.Affected if The version indicated in these files is lower than 2019.2.3
-
Verify administration UI accessibilityConfirm access to the TeamCity Administration section by navigating to the root URL and clicking Administration, or accessing /admin/admin.html.Affected if The administration interface is accessible and the TeamCity version is below 2019.2.3
You are affected if your TeamCity installation version is 2019.2.2 or any earlier version (2019.2.1, 2019.1.x, etc.) and the administration UI is accessible in your environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data2019.2.3
Upgrade TeamCity to version 2019.2.3 or later to remediate the stored XSS vulnerability in the administration UI.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-15830 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-15830 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data