CVE-2020-1613
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the BGP FlowSpec implementation may cause a Juniper Networks Junos OS device to terminate an established BGP session upon receiving a specific BGP FlowSpec advertisement. The BGP NOTIFICATION message that terminates an established BGP session is sent toward the peer device that originally sent the specific BGP FlowSpec advertisement. This specific BGP FlowSpec advertisement received from a BGP peer might get propagated from a Junos OS device running the fixed release to another device that is vulnerable causing BGP session termination downstream. This issue affects IPv4 and IPv6 BGP FlowSpec deployment. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: 12.3; 12.3X48 on SRX Series; 14.1X53 on EX and QFX Series; 15.1 versions prior to 15.1R7-S5; 15.1F versions prior to 15.1F6-S13; 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D180 on SRX Series; 15.1X53 versions prior to 15.1X53-D238 on QFX5200/QFX5110; 15.1X53 versions prior to 15.1X53-D497 on NFX Series; 15.1X53 versions prior to 15.1X53-D592 on EX2300/EX3400; 16.1 versions prior to 16.1R7-S7; 17.1 versions prior to 17.1R2-S12, 17.1R3; 17.2 versions prior to 17.2R2-S7, 17.2R3; 17.2X75 versions prior to 17.2X75-D102, 17.2X75-D110, 17.2X75-D44; 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R2-S5, 17.3R3-S5; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R1-S8, 17.4R2; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R2-S4, 18.1R3; 18.2X75 versions prior to 18.2X75-D20.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the BGP FlowSpec implementation in Juniper Junos OS allows a specially crafted BGP FlowSpec advertisement to trigger the device to send a BGP NOTIFICATION message that terminates the established BGP session with the peer that sent the malicious advertisement. This causes denial of service by disrupting BGP peering sessions. The malicious advertisement can propagate from a fixed device to vulnerable downstream devices, affecting both IPv4 and IPv6 BGP FlowSpec deployments.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.3= 15.1= 16.1= 17.1= 17.2= 17.2x75= 17.3= 17.4= 18.1= 18.2x75= 18.2x75-d10= 12.3x48CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Junos OS versionRun 'show version' or 'show system information' to obtain the installed Junos OS versionAffected if The installed version matches any of the following version families: 12.3, 12.3X48, 15.1, 15.1F6, 16.1, 17.1, 17.2, 17.2X75, 17.3, 17.4, 18.1, 18.2X75, or 18.2X75-D10 (these are the affected versions per the advisory)
-
Verify BGP FlowSpec is configuredRun 'show configuration protocols bgp' and look for 'flow-specification' or 'family inet flow' or 'family inet6 flow' under the BGP configurationAffected if BGP FlowSpec (flow-specification) is enabled under the BGP protocol configuration
-
Check for active BGP FlowSpec neighborsRun 'show bgp neighbor' or 'show bgp summary' and look for neighbors with FlowSpec family (inet flow or inet6 flow)Affected if There are active BGP peers exchanging FlowSpec routes
-
Review logs for BGP NOTIFICATION messagesCheck system logs (syslog) or run 'show log messages' and search for 'NOTIFICATION' related to BGP, especially after receiving FlowSpec advertisementsAffected if BGP NOTIFICATION messages appear in logs indicating session termination with FlowSpec peers
The environment is affected if the Junos OS version falls within the affected version range AND BGP FlowSpec is enabled and actively used with BGP peers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Junos OS to a fixed release (15.1R7-S5, 15.1F6-S13, 16.1R7-S7, 17.1R2-S12, 17.2R2-S7, 17.3R2-S5, 17.4R1-S8, 18.1R2-S4, or later as specified in the advisory). If upgrading is not immediately feasible, consider disabling BGP FlowSpec or implementing BGP prefix filtering to block untrusted FlowSpec advertisements.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-1613 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-1613 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data