HipserverApplication · Fieldcommgroup

CVE-2020-16209

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-05-19
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A malicious attacker could exploit the interface of the Fieldcomm Group HART-IP (release 1.0.0.0) by constructing messages with sufficiently large payloads to overflow the internal buffer and crash the device, or obtain control of the device.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Buffer overflow vulnerability in Fieldcomm Group HART-IP version 1.0.0.0 allows remote attackers to send specially crafted messages with oversized payloads that overflow an internal buffer, potentially enabling denial of service (device crash) or remote code execution (device control takeover).

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patch or firmware update if available; until then, implement network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict HART-IP traffic to authorized hosts only, and deploy intrusion detection to monitor for anomalous payload sizes.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
HipserverApplication
Affected:= 3.6.1
Hart Ip Developer Kit FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= 1.0.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify HART-IP components in your environment
    Inventory all systems running Fieldcomm Group HART-IP software, Hipserver, or Hart Ip Developer Kit. Check installed programs, running services, and device firmware listings.
    Affected if Any Hipserver version 3.6.1 or Hart Ip Developer Kit Firmware version 1.0.0.0 is found in the environment
  2. Verify Hipserver version
    Locate the Hipserver installation directory and check the version information (version file, executable properties, or software inventory). Compare to the affected version 3.6.1.
    Affected if Hipserver version is exactly 3.6.1
  3. Verify Hart Ip Developer Kit firmware version
    Check the firmware version on affected devices or consult device management interfaces. Compare to the affected version 1.0.0.0.
    Affected if Hart Ip Developer Kit firmware version is exactly 1.0.0.0
  4. Assess network exposure of HART-IP service
    Determine if HART-IP services are accessible from network segments. Review firewall rules, exposed ports, and network accessibility of devices running HART-IP.
    Affected if HART-IP service is network-accessible to untrusted hosts

Environment is affected if either Hipserver version 3.6.1 or Hart Ip Developer Kit Firmware version 1.0.0.0 is present AND the HART-IP service is network-accessible, allowing remote attackers to send oversized payloads.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patch or firmware update if available; until then, implement network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict HART-IP traffic to authorized hosts only, and deploy intrusion detection to monitor for anomalous payload sizes.

Fix this in Hipserver Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,940
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,304.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-16209 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-16209 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data