CVE-2020-16216
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn IntelliVue patient monitors MX100, MX400-550, MX600, MX700, MX750, MX800, MX850, MP2-MP90, and IntelliVue X2 and X3 Versions N and prior, the product receives input or data but does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties required to process the data safely and correctly, which can induce a denial-of-service condition through a system restart.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an input validation vulnerability in Philips IntelliVue patient monitors where the device fails to properly validate input data, allowing specially crafted input to trigger a system restart and denial of service. The vulnerability affects multiple monitor models and versions up to and including Version N.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= b.02= c.02= c.03= a.01all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your Philips patient monitor modelLocate the model number on the device label or system configuration documentation. Common affected models include IntelliVue MP2, MP90, MX100, MX400, MX850, X2, X3, or the Patient Information Center Ix (PIC Ix) or Performancebridge Focal Point systems.Affected if The model matches any of the affected products listed in the CVE (PIC Ix, Performancebridge Focal Point, IntelliVue MP2, MP90, MX100, MX400, MX850, X2, or X3).
-
Check the installed firmware or software versionAccess the device's service menu, system information screen, or administrative interface to view the current firmware version. For PIC Ix, check the application version (b.02, c.02, c.03). For Performancebridge Focal Point, check version a.01. For IntelliVue monitors, access the firmware version through the device UI or maintenance port.Affected if For PIC Ix: version is b.02, c.02, or c.03. For Performancebridge Focal Point: version is a.01. For all IntelliVue firmware variants (MP2, MP90, MX100, MX400, MX850, X2, X3): any firmware version is affected.
-
Determine if the device is network-connectedReview network configuration settings on the device or through your network infrastructure to see if the patient monitor has an active network connection (Ethernet, WiFi, or other network interfaces). Check firewall rules and access controls surrounding the device.Affected if The device has an active network connection that accepts external input, as the vulnerability is exploited through specially crafted input data sent to the device.
-
Review network segmentation and access controlsExamine your network architecture to determine if the patient monitor is isolated from untrusted networks or if it is directly accessible from the hospital network, guest networks, or the internet.Affected if The device is accessible from networks without proper access controls or segmentation, increasing the likelihood of receiving malicious input.
Your environment is affected if you have any of the listed Philips patient monitor models or software versions, particularly if the device is network-connected and could receive specially crafted input from an untrusted source.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware updates when available; until then, restrict network access to patient monitors and implement network segmentation to limit exposure to malicious input.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-16216 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-16216 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data