CVE-2020-1639
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen an attacker sends a specific crafted Ethernet Operation, Administration, and Maintenance (Ethernet OAM) packet to a target device, it may improperly handle the incoming malformed data and fail to sanitize this incoming data resulting in an overflow condition. This overflow condition in Juniper Networks Junos OS allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) condition by coring the CFM daemon. Continued receipt of these packets may cause an extended Denial of Service condition. This issue affects: Juniper Networks Junos OS 12.3 versions prior to 12.3R12-S15; 12.3X48 versions prior to 12.3X48-D95 on SRX Series; 14.1X50 versions prior to 14.1X50-D145; 14.1X53 versions prior to 14.1X53-D47; 15.1 versions prior to 15.1R2; 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D170 on SRX Series; 15.1X53 versions prior to 15.1X53-D67.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a buffer overflow vulnerability in the CFM (Connectivity Fault Management) daemon of Juniper Junos OS. When the device receives a specially crafted Ethernet OAM packet, the daemon fails to properly sanitize the malformed input, causing an overflow condition that results in the daemon coring (crashing). Repeated receipt of these packets creates a sustained DoS condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.3= 12.3x48= 14.1x50= 14.1x53= 15.1= 15.1x49= 15.1x53CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Junos OS versionRun 'show version' or 'show version detail' on the Juniper device CLI to retrieve the installed Junos OS version numberAffected if The version matches one of the affected ranges: 12.3, 12.3X48, 14.1X50, 14.1X53, 15.1, 15.1X49, or 15.1X53 (specific build numbers may vary within these branches)
-
Confirm CFM daemon is activeRun 'show cfm statistics' or 'show protocols oam' to verify the Connectivity Fault Management daemon is running on the deviceAffected if CFM/OAM functionality is enabled and the daemon is actively processing Ethernet OAM packets
-
Check CFM interface configurationRun 'show cfm interface' to list all interfaces where CFM is configuredAffected if Any interface has CFM MEP (Maintenance End Point) or MIP (Maintenance Intermediate Point) configured
-
Verify OAM protocol receptionInspect logs with 'show log messages | match CFM' or monitor traffic on interfaces configured for CFM to confirm the device is receiving Ethernet OAM packetsAffected if The device is processing incoming Ethernet OAM traffic on CFM-enabled interfaces
A user is affected if the device runs a Junos OS version within the affected ranges AND has CFM (Connectivity Fault Management) enabled, making it vulnerable to the buffer overflow when receiving malformed Ethernet OAM packets.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied Junos OS patches to the fixed versions listed (12.3R12-S15, 12.3X48-D95, 14.1X50-D145, etc.) or implement network-level filtering to block unauthorized Ethernet OAM traffic at perimeter devices.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-1639 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-1639 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data