CVE-2020-1664
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA stack buffer overflow vulnerability in the device control daemon (DCD) on Juniper Networks Junos OS allows a low privilege local user to create a Denial of Service (DoS) against the daemon or execute arbitrary code in the system with root privilege. This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS: 17.3 versions prior to 17.3R3-S9; 17.4 versions prior to 17.4R2-S12, 17.4R3-S3; 18.1 versions prior to 18.1R3-S11; 18.2 versions prior to 18.2R3-S6; 18.2X75 versions prior to 18.2X75-D53, 18.2X75-D65; 18.3 versions prior to 18.3R2-S4, 18.3R3-S4; 18.4 versions prior to 18.4R2-S5, 18.4R3-S5; 19.1 versions prior to 19.1R3-S3; 19.2 versions prior to 19.2R1-S5, 19.2R3; 19.3 versions prior to 19.3R2-S4, 19.3R3; 19.4 versions prior to 19.4R1-S3, 19.4R2-S2, 19.4R3; 20.1 versions prior to 20.1R1-S4, 20.1R2; 20.2 versions prior to 20.2R1-S1, 20.2R2. Versions of Junos OS prior to 17.3 are unaffected by this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the device control daemon (DCD) on Juniper Networks Junos OS. A low-privilege local user can trigger this overflow to cause denial of service against the DCD daemon or achieve arbitrary code execution with root privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 17.3= 17.4= 18.1= 18.2= 18.2x75= 18.3= 18.4= 19.1= 19.2= 19.3= 19.4= 20.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Junos OS versionExecute 'show version' or 'request system version' on the device CLI to retrieve the installed Junos OS version numberAffected if The displayed version matches one of the affected releases: 17.3, 17.4, 18.1, 18.2, 18.2x75, 18.3, 18.4, 19.1, 19.2, 19.3, 19.4, or 20.1
-
Confirm the DCD daemon is runningExecute 'show system processes daemon' or 'show system processes | match dcd' to verify the device control daemon (DCD) is active on the deviceAffected if The DCD daemon process is listed as running - the vulnerability is only exploitable when this daemon is active
-
Check DCD configuration statusReview the DCD configuration with 'show configuration | display set | match dcd' to see if device control interfaces are configured and activeAffected if DCD has active interface configurations - the vulnerability requires DCD to be managing network interfaces for exploitation
-
Verify if running a patched versionCompare your installed version against the fixed releases: 17.3R3-S9, 17.4R2-S12/17.4R3-S3, 18.1R3-S11, 18.2R3-S6, 18.2X75-D53/D65, 18.3R2-S4/18.3R3-S4, 18.4R2-S5/18.4R3-S5, 19.1R3-S3, 19.2R1-S5/19.2R3, 19.3R2-S4/19.3R3, 19.4R1-S3/19.4R2-S2/19.4R3, 20.1R1-S4/20.1R2, 20.2R1-S1/20.2R2 or laterAffected if The installed version is earlier than any of these fixed versions and the DCD daemon is running
The environment is affected if the device runs Junos OS versions 17.3 through 20.1 with the DCD daemon active and the version is older than the vendor-supplied patched releases.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied Junos OS software updates for the specific affected versions (17.3R3-S9, 17.4R2-S12/17.4R3-S3, 18.1R3-S11, 18.2R3-S6, 18.2X75-D53/D65, 18.3R2-S4/18.3R3-S4, 18.4R2-S5/18.4R3-S5, 19.1R3-S3, 19.2R1-S5/19.2R3, 19.3R2-S4/19.3R3, 19.4R1-S3/19.4R2-S2/19.4R3, 20.1R1-S4/20.1R2, 20.2R1-S1/20.2R2 or later).
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-1664 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-1664 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data