CVE-2020-16849
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered on Canon MF237w 06.07 devices. An "Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency" issue in the IPv4/ICMPv4 component, when handling a packet sent by an unauthenticated network attacker, may expose Sensitive Information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Canon MF237w printer firmware contains an improper handling of length parameter inconsistency vulnerability in its IPv4/ICMPv4 packet processing component. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send specially crafted ICMPv4 packets to trigger the vulnerability, potentially causing the device to expose sensitive information due to incorrect length validation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 06.07all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Canon device modelAccess the printer's web interface (if available) or print a configuration/system page to determine the exact model number. Common ways: navigate to http://[printer-ip] in a browser, or print a page using the control panel (often via 'Menu' > 'System Settings' > 'Print Report').Affected if The model is one of: MF237w, MF113w, MF212w, MF216n, MF217w, MF226dn, MF229dw, or MF231.
-
Determine the installed firmware versionIn the printer's web interface, look under 'Device Information', 'System Settings', or 'Firmware Update' section. Alternatively, print a configuration page from the control panel (Menu > System Settings > List Print > User Data List or similar) which typically lists the firmware version.Affected if For MF237w: firmware version equals 06.07. For MF113w, MF212w, MF216n, MF217w, MF226dn, MF229dw, or MF231: any firmware version (all versions affected).
-
Verify IPv4 network connectivity to the printerFrom a computer on the same network, ping the printer's IPv4 address: 'ping [printer-ip]' or use 'nmap -sn [printer-ip]' to confirm the device is reachable over IPv4.Affected if The printer responds to ICMP echo requests (pings) or is otherwise reachable over IPv4, indicating IPv4 is enabled and accessible.
-
Confirm ICMPv4 is reachable from untrusted networksCheck network segmentation: determine if the printer is on the same network segment as untrusted users, or if ICMP traffic from outside the local network can reach the device. Use network scanning tools like 'nmap -sU -p123 [printer-ip]' to test ICMP accessibility, or review firewall rules allowing ICMP to the printer.Affected if The printer's ICMPv4 service is accessible from network segments that contain untrusted or unknown users, or ICMP is not blocked by a firewall.
The device is affected if it is a Canon MF237w (firmware 06.07) or any of the other listed models (MF113w, MF212w, MF216n, MF217w, MF226dn, MF229dw, MF231) at any firmware version, AND the device is network-accessible via IPv4 with ICMP reachable from untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the latest Canon firmware update for the MF237w device. As an interim control, restrict network access to the printer by placing it behind a firewall or in a restricted VLAN, and block ICMP traffic from untrusted networks.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-16849 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-16849 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data