CVE-2020-17367
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFirejail through 0.9.62 does not honor the -- end-of-options indicator after the --output option, which may lead to command injection.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceFirejail through 0.9.62 contains a command injection vulnerability in its argument parsing logic. The -- end-of-options delimiter is not properly honored after the --output option, allowing attacker-controlled arguments to be interpreted as additional options rather than as literal arguments to the sandboxed command. This can lead to arbitrary command execution by bypassing the intended sandboxing mechanism.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.0= 9.0= 31= 32<= 0.9.62= 15.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Firejail versionRun 'firejail --version' or check package manager (dpkg -l firejail, rpm -q firejail)Affected if Version is 0.9.62 or lower
-
Identify scripts or configs using --output optionSearch for '--output' in /etc/firejail, ~/.config/firejail, and any shell scripts that invoke firejail (grep -r '--output' /etc/firejail ~/.config 2>/dev/null)Affected if The --output option is used with user-controlled or untrusted arguments
-
Check for proper delimiter usage with --outputReview firejail command lines to see if '--' delimiter appears after --output and before the sandboxed command argumentsAffected if The '--' delimiter is missing between --output and the command arguments
-
Verify argument handling in custom profilesInspect custom .profile files in ~/.config/firejail/ for any --output usage and how arguments are passedAffected if Profiles pass arguments to firejail without proper quoting or delimiter handling
You are affected if Firejail version is 0.9.62 or lower AND the --output option is used with arguments that could be controlled by untrusted input without proper '--' delimiter protection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Firejail to a patched version beyond 0.9.62, or if no upgrade is available, avoid using the --output option with untrusted/sanitized input and implement strict input validation on all arguments passed to Firejail.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-17367 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-17367 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data