Foxit ReaderApplication · Foxitsoftware

CVE-2020-17417

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-10-13
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 10.0.1.35811 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.0.1.35811. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-11657.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a use-after-free or null pointer dereference vulnerability in Foxit Reader 10.0.1.35811's Annotation object handling. The application fails to validate object existence before performing operations on it, allowing an attacker who tricks a user into opening a malicious PDF to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

MitigationDeploy the vendor patch or upgrade Foxit Reader to the latest version. Users should avoid opening untrusted PDF files and disable JavaScript execution in Foxit Reader settings as a defense-in-depth measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Foxit ReaderApplication
Affected:<= 10.0.1.35811
PhantompdfApplication
Affected:<= 10.0.1.35811

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if Foxit Reader is installed
    Locate Foxit Reader executable (typically in Program Files or Program Files (x86) folder) or check Start Menu for Foxit Reader entry
    Affected if Foxit Reader executable exists on the system
  2. Determine installed Foxit Reader version
    Right-click the Foxit Reader executable, select Properties, and check the Details tab for the Product Version field; alternatively, open Foxit Reader and go to Help > About Foxit Reader
    Affected if Version number displayed is 10.0.1.35811 or lower (any version up to and including 10.0.1.35811)
  3. Check for Foxit PhantomPDF installation
    Look for Foxit PhantomPDF in Program Files/Program Files (x86) or check installed programs list; verify version similarly via Properties > Details or Help > About
    Affected if PhantomPDF is installed with version 10.0.1.35811 or lower
  4. Confirm application handles PDF files
    Verify the system has PDF file associations configured for Foxit Reader, or confirm the user routinely opens PDF files using Foxit Reader
    Affected if PDF files are opened with Foxit Reader or PhantomPDF (the vulnerability triggers when a malicious PDF is opened)

A user is affected if Foxit Reader or PhantomPDF version 10.0.1.35811 or lower is installed and the application is used to open PDF files, since the vulnerability exploits malformed Annotation objects in maliciously crafted PDFs.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 10.0.1.35811
Interim mitigation

Deploy the vendor patch or upgrade Foxit Reader to the latest version. Users should avoid opening untrusted PDF files and disable JavaScript execution in Foxit Reader settings as a defense-in-depth measure.

Fix this in Foxit Reader Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $890
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-17417 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-17417 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data