CVE-2020-17533
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApache Accumulo versions 1.5.0 through 1.10.0 and version 2.0.0 do not properly check the return value of some policy enforcement functions before permitting an authenticated user to perform certain administrative operations. Specifically, the return values of the 'canFlush' and 'canPerformSystemActions' security functions are not checked in some instances, therefore allowing an authenticated user with insufficient permissions to perform the following actions: flushing a table, shutting down Accumulo or an individual tablet server, and setting or removing system-wide Accumulo configuration properties.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Accumulo versions 1.5.0-1.10.0 and 2.0.0 have an authorization bypass where the return values of security functions 'canFlush' and 'canPerformSystemActions' are not checked in certain code paths, allowing authenticated users with insufficient permissions to flush tables, shutdown Accumulo/tservers, and modify system-wide configuration properties.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.5.0, <= 1.10.0= 2.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Accumulo installation and versionRun 'accumulo version' or check the Accumulo JAR files in the installation directory for the version numberAffected if The installed version is 1.5.0 through 1.10.0 inclusive, or exactly version 2.0.0
-
Confirm authentication is enabledCheck the accumulo-site.xml configuration file for the 'instance.security.authenticator' property; verify it is not set to 'org.apache.accumulo.server.security.authenticator.DisabledAuthenticator'Affected if Authentication is enabled (not disabled), meaning users must provide credentials to access Accumulo
-
Verify user permissions configurationUse the Accumulo shell with an admin account and run 'user - list' or check the contents of the 'accumulo.users' table in Zookeeper to see registered users and their permissionsAffected if There exist non-admin users with limited permissions who could attempt the unauthorized operations
-
Check for exposure of administrative operationsVerify that the Accumulo master and tserver processes are running and accessible on the network; check if the RPC ports (9999 for master, 9997 for tserver) are exposedAffected if The Accumulo services are network-accessible, allowing remote authenticated users to trigger the vulnerable code paths
-
Test for the vulnerable flush operationUsing a non-admin user account in the Accumulo shell, attempt to run 'flush' on a table the user does not have flush permission for; check if the operation succeeds when it should failAffected if The flush operation completes without a permission error for a user lacking flush permission (indicates the bypass is present)
A user is affected if they are running Accumulo version 1.5.0-1.10.0 or 2.0.0, have authentication enabled, and have users with restricted permissions in their environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to Apache Accumulo 1.10.1, 1.11.0, 2.1.0, or later versions where return values of policy enforcement functions are properly checked.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-17533 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-17533 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data