CVE-2020-1800
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHUAWEI smartphones P30 with versions earlier than 10.0.0.185(C00E85R1P11) have an improper access control vulnerability. The software incorrectly restricts access to a function interface from an unauthorized actor, the attacker tricks the user into installing a crafted application, successful exploit could allow the attacker do certain unauthenticated operations.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImproper access control vulnerability in HUAWEI P30 smartphones allows a crafted application to bypass authentication and access function interfaces that should be restricted. The attacker tricks the user into installing the malicious application, which can then perform unauthenticated operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.0.185\(c00e85r1p11\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelGo to Settings > About Phone > Model Name, or check the device physical label, to confirm it is a HUAWEI P30Affected if Device is not a HUAWEI P30 (not affected by this specific vulnerability)
-
Check firmware version numberGo to Settings > About Phone > Version > Build Number, or dial *#*#2846579#*#* to access engineering menu, then check the SW versionAffected if Firmware version is 10.0.0.185(c00e85r1p11) or higher (not affected); version is below 10.0.0.185(c00e85r1p11) (potentially affected)
-
Verify if installation from untrusted sources is permittedGo to Settings > Apps > Menu (three dots) > Special access > Install unknown apps, or check Settings > Security > Unknown sources, to see which applications can install other appsAffected if Unknown sources/Install unknown apps is enabled for any application (allows the attack vector to work)
Device is affected if it is a HUAWEI P30 running firmware version below 10.0.0.185(c00e85r1p11) AND has the ability to install applications from untrusted sources enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data10.0.0.185
Update HUAWEI P30 to version 10.0.0.185(C00E85R1P11) or later. Avoid installing applications from untrusted sources.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-1800 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-1800 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data