CVE-2020-1819
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThere are multiple out of bounds (OOB) read vulnerabilities in the implementation of the Common Open Policy Service (COPS) protocol of some Huawei products. The specific decoding function may occur out-of-bounds read when processes an incoming data packet. Successful exploit of these vulnerabilities may disrupt service on the affected device. (Vulnerability ID: HWPSIRT-2018-12275,HWPSIRT-2018-12276,HWPSIRT-2018-12277,HWPSIRT-2018-12278,HWPSIRT-2018-12279,HWPSIRT-2018-12280 and HWPSIRT-2018-12289) The seven vulnerabilities have been assigned seven Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) IDs: CVE-2020-1818, CVE-2020-1819, CVE-2020-1820, CVE-2020-1821, CVE-2020-1822, CVE-2020-1823 and CVE-2020-1824.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceOut-of-bounds (OOB) read vulnerabilities exist in the COPS (Common Open Policy Service) protocol decoding function of affected Huawei products. When processing incoming data packets, the decoding function may read beyond allocated buffer boundaries, potentially causing service disruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= v500r001c30= v500r001c60= v500r005c00= v500r002c00= v500r002c20= v500r005c00= v500r001c30= v500r001c60= v500r005c00= v500r001c30= v500r001c60= v500r005c00= v500r001c60= v500r005c00= v500r001c30= v500r001c60= v500r005c00= v500r001c30= v500r001c60= v500r005c00= v500r001c30= v500r005c00CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the product modelAccess the device CLI (console/ssh) or web management interface and retrieve the hardware model and product name. In CLI, common commands include 'display device information' or 'display version'.Affected if The model matches any of the following: Huawei Ips Module, Ngfw Module, Nip6300, Nip6600, Nip6800, Secospace Usg6300, Secospace Usg6500, or Secospace Usg6600.
-
Check firmware versionIn device CLI, run 'display version' or 'display firmware version' to obtain the current firmware version. Compare the version number exactly against the affected versions: v500r001c30, v500r001c60, v500r002c00, v500r002c20, or v500r005c00.Affected if The installed firmware version exactly matches any of: v500r001c30, v500r001c60, v500r002c00, v500r002c20, or v500r005c00.
-
Verify COPS protocol is enabledIn device CLI, check COPS protocol configuration. Common commands include 'display cops status' or 'display service cops' or 'display current-configuration | include cops'. If COPS is listed as enabled or configured, it is active.Affected if The COPS protocol is enabled or configured on the device.
-
Confirm COPS listener statusCheck if the device is listening on COPS ports (typically port 3288). In CLI, run 'display ip interface' or 'display service-list' to see listening services. Alternatively, check COPS policy configurations with 'display cops policy' or similar.Affected if The device has COPS services actively listening for incoming connections or processing COPS packets.
A device is affected if it runs one of the listed firmware versions AND has COPS protocol enabled and actively processing incoming data packets.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply available Huawei security patches or firmware updates for the affected products. If patches are unavailable, consider disabling the COPS protocol or implementing network-level access controls to limit exposure to untrusted sources.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-1819 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-1819 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data