CVE-2020-1839
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHUAWEI Mate 30 with versions earlier than 10.1.0.150(C00E136R5P3) have a race condition vulnerability. There is a timing window exists in which certain pointer members can be modified by another process that is operating concurrently, an attacker should trick the user into running a crafted application with high privilege, successful exploit could cause code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability in HUAWEI Mate 30 firmware versions earlier than 10.1.0.150(C00E136R5P3) creates a timing window where concurrent processes can modify pointer members. Successful exploitation requires tricking a user into running a crafted high-privilege application, which can then lead to arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.1.0.150\(c00e136r5p3\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is Huawei Mate 30Check the device settings or system information to verify the exact model number of the phoneAffected if Device is any model other than Huawei Mate 30 - the vulnerability only affects Mate 30
-
Check installed firmware versionNavigate to Settings > About Phone > Version on the device, or use *#*#2846579#*#* to access engineering menu, or check via Huawei HiSuite PC softwareAffected if Firmware version cannot be determined or is earlier than 10.1.0.150(C00E136R5P3)
-
Verify firmware build numberLook for the specific build identifier (C00E136R5P3) in the version details - the full version string typically appears as 10.1.0.150(C00E136R5P3)Affected if Build number is missing, shows a different build, or is earlier than C00E136R5P3
The device is affected if it is a Huawei Mate 30 running firmware version earlier than 10.1.0.150(C00E136R5P3); devices on version 10.1.0.150(C00E136R5P3) or later, or non-Mate 30 devices, are not affected by this specific CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data10.1.0.150
Apply the vendor firmware update (version 10.1.0.150(C00E136R5P3) or later) to patch the race condition vulnerability.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-1839 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-1839 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data