CVE-2020-1881
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNIP6800;Secospace USG6600;USG9500 products with versions of V500R001C30; V500R001C60SPC500; V500R005C00SPC100 have have a resource management error vulnerability. An attacker needs to perform specific operations to trigger a function of the affected device. Due to improper resource management of the function, the vulnerability can be exploited to cause service abnormal on affected devices.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a resource management error vulnerability in Huawei NIP6800, Secospace USG6600, and USG9500 firewall appliances affecting specific firmware versions (V500R001C30, V500R001C60SPC500, V500R005C00SPC100). An attacker with the ability to perform specific operations on the device can trigger a function with improper resource management, causing service abnormal (likely denial of service). The CVSS 7.5 indicates the vulnerability is network-exploitable with low attack complexity.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= v500r001c30= v500r001c30spc200= v500r001c30spc600= v500r001c30spc200= v500r001c30spc600= v500r007c60spc100CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelLog into the device console or check device inventory to determine if the model is Huawei NIP6800, Secospace USG6600, USG9500, or Oceanstor 5310Affected if Device is NOT one of these models - not affected
-
Check firmware version on NIP6800Access device CLI and run command 'display version' or check firmware file name. Compare against V500R001C30Affected if Firmware version equals V500R001C30 - affected
-
Check firmware version on Secospace USG6600Access device CLI and run command 'display version' or check firmware file name. Compare against V500R001C30SPC200 and V500R001C30SPC600Affected if Firmware version equals V500R001C30SPC200 or V500R001C30SPC600 - affected
-
Check firmware version on USG9500Access device CLI and run command 'display version' or check firmware file name. Compare against V500R001C30SPC200 and V500R001C30SPC600Affected if Firmware version equals V500R001C30SPC200 or V500R001C30SPC600 - affected
-
Check firmware version on Oceanstor 5310Access device management interface and check firmware version. Compare against V500R007C60SPC100Affected if Firmware version equals V500R007C60SPC100 - affected
-
Monitor for service degradationReview system logs, performance metrics, and alert configurations for signs of resource exhaustion, unexpected service restarts, or abnormal traffic patterns that may indicate exploitationAffected if Device meets version criteria AND showing resource management issues - likely exploited
User is affected if their Huawei NIP6800, Secospace USG6600, USG9500, or Oceanstor 5310 device runs any of the specific firmware versions listed, and the device is network-accessible to potential attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware patches when available; if patches are unavailable, restrict access to the triggering function through access control lists and monitor for signs of resource exhaustion or service degradation.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-1881 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-1881 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data