CVE-2020-1946
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Apache SpamAssassin before 3.4.5, malicious rule configuration (.cf) files can be configured to run system commands without any output or errors. With this, exploits can be injected in a number of scenarios. In addition to upgrading to SA version 3.4.5, users should only use update channels or 3rd party .cf files from trusted places.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache SpamAssassin before 3.4.5 contains a critical vulnerability where malicious rule configuration (.cf) files can execute system commands silently without generating any output or errors. This allows attackers to inject exploits through untrusted rule files, achieving arbitrary command execution on the affected system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.4.5= 9.0= 10.0= 32= 33= 34CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed SpamAssassin versionRun 'spamassassin --version' or 'sa-learn --version' to display the version numberAffected if The reported version is lower than 3.4.5 (for example, 3.4.4, 3.4.3, etc.)
-
Identify loaded .cf configuration filesRun 'spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep -i "loading"' or check the spamassassin configuration for lines starting with 'loadplugin' or 'include' to see which .cf files are being loadedAffected if Any .cf files are loaded from directories outside the default trusted system paths (e.g., from user home directories, /tmp, or untrusted third-party sources)
-
Review the sa-update or rule update configurationCheck /etc/spamassassin/local.cf and any files in /etc/spamassassin/ for 'sa-update' or 'external sources' configuration, and look for custom 'include' or 'loadplugin' directives pointing to untrusted locationsAffected if The configuration loads rules or updates from unverified or third-party sources not from the official SpamAssassin project
-
Check for untrusted custom .cf files in user-accessible locationsInspect directories such as ~/.spamassassin/, /var/lib/spamassassin/, or any custom path specified in the configuration for .cf files that may have been added by untrusted partiesAffected if Any .cf files exist in user-writable or untrusted directories that are being loaded by SpamAssassin
You are affected if your installed SpamAssassin version is below 3.4.5 AND your configuration loads .cf rule files from untrusted or non-official sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.4.5
Immediately upgrade to SpamAssassin 3.4.5 or later, and audit all existing .cf rule files to remove any untrusted or suspicious configurations. Implement a policy to only use update channels and third-party .cf files from known trusted sources.
SpamAssassin 3.4.5 or later
- Check current SpamAssassin version: spamassassin --version
- For Debian/Ubuntu: Run 'apt-get update && apt-get install spamassassin' to upgrade to the latest available version
- For Fedora: Run 'dnf update spamassassin' to upgrade to the latest available version
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version is 3.4.5 or later: spamassassin --version
- Restart the spamassassin service to load the new version: systemctl restart spamassassin (or appropriate service name for your system)
- Review and ensure only trusted rule configuration (.cf) files are in use, as the vulnerability can be exploited via malicious rule files
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-1946 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-1946 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data