CVE-2020-2002
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn authentication bypass by spoofing vulnerability exists in the authentication daemon and User-ID components of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS by failing to verify the integrity of the Kerberos key distribution center (KDC) before authenticating users. This affects all forms of authentication that use a Kerberos authentication profile. A man-in-the-middle type of attacker with the ability to intercept communication between PAN-OS and KDC can login to PAN-OS as an administrator. This issue affects: PAN-OS 7.1 versions earlier than 7.1.26; PAN-OS 8.1 versions earlier than 8.1.13; PAN-OS 9.0 versions earlier than 9.0.6; All version of PAN-OS 8.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePAN-OS fails to verify the integrity of the Kerberos Key Distribution Center (KDC) before authenticating users in the authentication daemon and User-ID components. A man-in-the-middle attacker intercepting communication between PAN-OS and the KDC can bypass authentication and login as an administrator using any Kerberos authentication profile.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.1.0, < 7.1.26>= 8.0.0, <= 8.0.20>= 8.1.0, < 8.1.13>= 9.0.0, < 9.0.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check PAN-OS versionFrom the PAN-OS management interface, go to Device > Support or use the command 'show system info' in the CLI to view the installed version.Affected if The installed version falls within these ranges: 7.1.0 to 7.1.26 (excluding 7.1.26), 8.0.0 to 8.0.20, 8.1.0 to 8.1.13 (excluding 8.1.13), or 9.0.0 to 9.0.6 (excluding 9.0.6).
-
Verify if Kerberos authentication profiles existIn the PAN-OS web interface, navigate to Device > User Identification > Authentication Profile and review any profiles configured. In the CLI, use 'show running auth-profile' to list configured authentication profiles.Affected if Any authentication profile is configured that uses Kerberos as the authentication method.
-
Confirm User-ID Kerberos integrationIn the web interface, go to Device > User Identification > User-ID Agents or check the Kerberos Key Distribution Center (KDC) settings under Server Profile configuration. Verify if User-ID is configured to use Kerberos for LDAP or other integrations.Affected if User-ID is enabled and configured to authenticate against a Kerberos KDC.
-
Identify KDC server configurationCheck the configured authentication profile for the Kerberos server settings: look for the KDC hostname/IP under the authentication profile Kerberos settings, or use 'show kerberos' in the CLI to display the configured Kerberos server profile.Affected if A Kerberos KDC server is defined in the PAN-OS configuration.
You are affected if your PAN-OS version is within the vulnerable ranges AND you have Kerberos authentication profiles configured that communicate with a KDC, enabling a MITM attacker to intercept and impersonate the KDC to bypass authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data7.1.268.1.139.0.6
Upgrade PAN-OS to version 7.1.26, 8.1.13, 9.0.6 or later. Until upgraded, implement network controls to prevent MITM attacks between PAN-OS and the KDC, such as enforcing IPsec or private network paths.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-2002 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-2002 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data