Pan OsOperating system · Paloaltonetworks

CVE-2020-2027

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-06-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 8.1.13 / 9.0.7 or later.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A buffer overflow vulnerability in the authd component of the PAN-OS management server allows authenticated administrators to disrupt system processes and potentially execute arbitrary code with root privileges. This issue affects: All versions of PAN-OS 7.1 and PAN-OS 8.0; PAN-OS 8.1 versions earlier than PAN-OS 8.1.13; PAN-OS 9.0 versions earlier than PAN-OS 9.0.7.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A buffer overflow in the authd (authentication daemon) component of PAN-OS management server allows authenticated administrators to disrupt system processes and potentially achieve arbitrary code execution with root privileges. This is a local privilege escalation within the management interface context, requiring high-privileged admin access.

MitigationUpgrade PAN-OS to version 8.1.13 or later (8.x branch), 9.0.7 or later (9.x branch), or migrate to 7.1+ for 7.x deployments. As a compensating control, restrict management interface access to a limited trusted admin group.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Pan OsOperating system
Affected:>= 7.1.0, <= 7.1.26>= 8.0.0, <= 8.0.20>= 8.1.0, < 8.1.13>= 9.0.0, < 9.0.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check PAN-OS version
    Log into the PAN-OS device via CLI and run: `show system info` or `show version`. Look for the 'sw-version' or 'PanOS' version field.
    Affected if The displayed version falls within any of these ranges: 7.1.0-7.1.26, 8.0.0-8.0.20, 8.1.0-8.1.12, or 9.0.0-9.0.6.
  2. Verify management interface accessibility
    Check the management interface configuration via CLI: `show management interface` or review the network settings to determine if the management interface (TCP port 443) is exposed to untrusted networks.
    Affected if The management interface is accessible from networks outside the trusted admin group.
  3. Confirm high-privileged admin accounts exist
    Review admin accounts with superuser or privilege escalation capabilities via: `show admin role` or by checking the admin user list with `show admins`.
    Affected if There are multiple high-privileged administrator accounts, increasing the attack surface for this vulnerability.
  4. Check authd process status
    Verify the authentication daemon is running via CLI: `show system resources` or `show process system` to confirm the authd process is active.
    Affected if The authd process is running, which is required for the buffer overflow to be exploitable.

You are affected if your PAN-OS version is 7.1.0-7.1.26, 8.0.0-8.0.20, 8.1.0-8.1.12, or 9.0.0-9.0.6 AND your management interface is accessible to administrators beyond a limited trusted group.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 8.1.13 / 9.0.7 or later
Fixed in 8.1.139.0.7
Interim mitigation

Upgrade PAN-OS to version 8.1.13 or later (8.x branch), 9.0.7 or later (9.x branch), or migrate to 7.1+ for 7.x deployments. As a compensating control, restrict management interface access to a limited trusted admin group.

Fix this in Pan Os Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-2027 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-2027 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data