Code Coverage ApiApplication · Jenkins
CVE-2020-2172
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJenkins Code Coverage API Plugin 1.1.4 and earlier does not configure its XML parser to prevent XML external entity (XXE) attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins Code Coverage API Plugin versions 1.1.4 and earlier does not configure its XML parser to prevent XML External Entity (XXE) attacks. This allows attackers to supply malicious XML input containing external entity references to potentially access sensitive files on the server or cause denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Code Coverage ApiApplication
<= 1.1.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Code Coverage API Plugin is installedNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab, or inspect the plugin directory (typically $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/) for a folder named 'code-coverage-api'Affected if The plugin folder or entry exists in the Jenkins plugin list
-
Determine the installed version of the Code Coverage API PluginIn Jenkins UI, go to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed and locate Code Coverage API in the list to view its version. Alternatively, check the manifest file inside the plugin folder (META-INF/MANIFEST.MF) for the Plugin-Version attributeAffected if The displayed version is 1.1.4 or any earlier version number
-
Confirm the plugin is enabled for useReview pipeline configurations or freestyle job configurations to see if the 'Publish code coverage results' post-build step or any Code Coverage API related build step is configuredAffected if The plugin is actively used in any job configuration, as XXE can be triggered when the plugin processes XML coverage reports
The environment is affected if the Code Coverage API Plugin is installed with version 1.1.4 or earlier and is being used to process coverage reports containing XML data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade the Code Coverage API Plugin to version 1.1.5 or later, which configures the XML parser to prevent XXE attacks by disabling external entity processing.
Fix this in Code Coverage Api
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-2172 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-2172 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data