GatlingApplication · Jenkins

CVE-2020-2173

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-04-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.2.7 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jenkins Gatling Plugin 1.2.7 and earlier prevents Content-Security-Policy headers from being set for Gatling reports served by the plugin, resulting in an XSS vulnerability exploitable by users able to change report content.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Jenkins Gatling Plugin versions 1.2.7 and earlier prevent Content-Security-Policy headers from being set on Gatling reports served by the plugin. This allows cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks because malicious script content within reports can execute without CSP restrictions. Users with the ability to modify or inject content into Gatling reports can exploit this vulnerability.

MitigationUpgrade the Jenkins Gatling Plugin to version 1.2.8 or later, which implements proper Content-Security-Policy headers for served reports. If upgrading is not immediately possible, limit report modification permissions to trusted users only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
GatlingApplication
Affected:<= 1.2.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Gatling Plugin is installed
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'Gatling', or run: java -jar jenkins-cli.jar list-plugins (if CLI is available), or inspect the $JENKINS_HOME/plugins directory for a gatling.hpi or gatling.jpi file
    Affected if The Gatling plugin is present in the Jenkins environment
  2. Identify the installed Gatling Plugin version
    In the Jenkins UI, click on the Gatling plugin entry in the Installed plugins list to reveal the version number, or examine the plugin manifest file at $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/gatling/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
    Affected if The version is 1.2.7 or earlier
  3. Determine if Gatling reports are being served
    Check Jenkins job configurations for any jobs that run Gatling load tests and publish reports via the 'Publish Gatling reports' post-build action; inspect the $JENKINS_HOME/jobs/<job-name>/builds/<build-number>/gatling directory for generated report content
    Affected if Gatling reports are being generated and served through Jenkins web UI
  4. Check for untrusted user access to report content
    Review Jenkins project-based matrix authorization or overall matrix permissions to identify users or groups with Job/Build permissions who are not fully trusted; examine whether anonymous or external users have the ability to configure or modify Gatling-related job settings
    Affected if Users who are not fully trusted have permissions to create, modify, or configure jobs that generate Gatling reports

You are affected if the Gatling Plugin version is 1.2.7 or earlier AND Gatling reports are being served AND untrusted users have the ability to modify or inject content into those reports.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.2.7
Interim mitigation

Upgrade the Jenkins Gatling Plugin to version 1.2.8 or later, which implements proper Content-Security-Policy headers for served reports. If upgrading is not immediately possible, limit report modification permissions to trusted users only.

Fix this in Gatling Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-2173 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-2173 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data