CVE-2020-21816
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA heab based buffer overflow issue exists in GNU LibreDWG 0.10.2641 via htmlescape ../../programs/escape.c:46.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the htmlescape function in GNU LibreDWG version 0.10.2641 (and possibly earlier versions). The overflow occurs in programs/escape.c at line 46, where insufficient bounds checking during HTML escaping allows a remote attacker to overflow a heap-allocated buffer, potentially leading to denial of service or arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.10.2641CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify GNU LibreDWG installationRun 'dpkg -l libredwg' on Debian-based systems, 'rpm -qa | grep -i redwg' on RHEL-based systems, or check for the 'dwggrep' or 'dwg2dxf' binaries in your PATH using 'which dwggrep' or 'which dwg2dxf'Affected if LibreDWG is not installed or no binaries are found in PATH
-
Check installed LibreDWG versionRun 'libredwg --version' or check the package version via your system's package manager. Compare the version number to 0.10.2641 or earlier versions.Affected if The installed version is 0.10.2641 or any version prior to it
-
Identify processes or tools using the htmlescape functionSearch for compiled binaries or scripts that link against the LibreDWG library and invoke HTML escaping functionality. Review application logs or code that calls escape.c functions.Affected if Any tool or application uses LibreDWG's escape functionality for HTML processing
-
Inspect the escape.c file in your LibreDWG installationLocate the programs/escape.c file in your installed LibreDWG source or package (typically in /usr/src or /usr/share/libredwg). Verify line 46 contains the htmlescape function with bounds checking logic.Affected if The escape.c file exists and contains the vulnerable htmlescape function at line 46
-
Test htmlescape with oversized inputIf you have access to the htmlescape function via CLI tool or test harness, provide an HTML string exceeding typical buffer limits to observe for crashes or memory corruption indicators.Affected if The program crashes, aborts, or exhibits undefined behavior when processing large HTML strings
You are affected if GNU LibreDWG version 0.10.2641 or earlier is installed AND your environment uses the htmlescape function for HTML escaping operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate GNU LibreDWG to the latest patched version. If no update is available, implement input length validation and proper buffer size checking in the htmlescape function before processing any data.
Latest stable release beyond 0.10.2641 (check GitHub releases for post-0.10.2641 version)
- 1. Identify all systems running Libredwg version 0.10.2641
- 2. Upgrade Libredwg to the latest stable version available from the official repository at https://github.com/LibreDWG/libredwg
- 3. Verify the upgrade by checking the installed version: `libredwg --version`
- 4. Test that affected functionality (htmlescape in programs/escape.c) works correctly with the new version
- 5. Re-scan or re-test for the presence of CVE-2020-21816 to confirm remediation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-21816 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-21816 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data