Self Organizing Swarm ModulesPlugin / extension · Jenkins

CVE-2020-2192

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-06-03
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 3.20 or later.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Self-Organizing Swarm Plug-in Modules Plugin 3.20 and earlier allows attackers to add or remove agent labels.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a CSRF vulnerability in Jenkins Self-Organizing Swarm Plug-in Modules Plugin versions 3.20 and earlier. The plugin fails to properly validate anti-CSRF tokens, allowing attackers to craft malicious requests that trick authenticated users into adding or removing agent labels on Jenkins nodes.

MitigationUpgrade to plugin version 3.21 or later which includes CSRF protection. If immediate upgrade is not possible, ensure Jenkins global security settings enforce CSRF protection and restrict administrative access to trusted users only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Self Organizing Swarm ModulesPlugin / extension
Affected:<= 3.20

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Swarm Plug-in Modules is installed
    Navigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed and search for 'Swarm Plug-in Modules' or 'self-organizing-swarm-mod'. Confirm the plugin appears in the list of installed plugins.
    Affected if The plugin is not installed, this CVE does not apply.
  2. Check plugin version number
    In the Installed Plugins list, locate the Swarm Plug-in Modules entry and note the Version column. Compare this version against the affected range: versions 3.20 and earlier.
    Affected if Installed version is 3.20 or lower (for example, 3.20, 3.19, 3.18, etc.).
  3. Confirm plugin is actively configured
    Navigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Configure Global Security and review Swarm client configuration or any Swarm-related settings. Also check if any Swarm client configurations exist under node management or agent configurations.
    Affected if The plugin is installed but not actively configured or used, the exploit surface is reduced but the vulnerable code is still present.
  4. Review Jenkins CSRF protection settings
    Go to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Configure Global Security and locate the 'CSRF Protection' section. Check whether protection is enabled or disabled.
    Affected if CSRF protection is disabled, the exploit is fully functional. If enabled, the attack requires additional conditions but the vulnerable plugin still exists.

You are affected if the Swarm Plug-in Modules plugin is installed with version 3.20 or earlier, regardless of CSRF protection settings, since the plugin itself fails to validate anti-CSRF tokens.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 3.20
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to plugin version 3.21 or later which includes CSRF protection. If immediate upgrade is not possible, ensure Jenkins global security settings enforce CSRF protection and restrict administrative access to trusted users only.

Fix this in Self Organizing Swarm Modules Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-2192 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-2192 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data