CVE-2020-2199
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJenkins Subversion Partial Release Manager Plugin 1.0.1 and earlier does not escape the error message for the repository URL field form validation, resulting in a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins Subversion Partial Release Manager Plugin versions 1.0.1 and earlier contains a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The error message displayed during repository URL field form validation does not properly escape user-supplied input, allowing an attacker to inject malicious JavaScript that executes in the victim's browser when the validation error is rendered.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify plugin installationNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed, or use Jenkins CLI: java -jar jenkins-cli.jar -s http://localhost:8080 list-plugins | grep -i 'subversion.*partial.*release'Affected if The Subversion Partial Release Manager plugin is not listed in installed plugins
-
Confirm plugin versionIn Jenkins UI, go to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed and locate Subversion Partial Release Manager plugin to view its version number; compare against affected version 1.0.1Affected if The installed version is 1.0.1 or any version earlier than 1.0.1
-
Check access to repository URL fieldLocate the Subversion Partial Release Manager configuration page in Jenkins where repository URL fields are presented for form inputAffected if The Subversion Partial Release Manager configuration interface with repository URL fields is accessible to the user
-
Verify form validation triggers error displayAttempt to submit an invalid or unusual repository URL value in the Subversion Partial Release Manager form to trigger the validation error pathAffected if The user can trigger form validation that displays an error message for the repository URL field
A user is affected if the Subversion Partial Release Manager plugin version 1.0.1 or earlier is installed and the user can access the repository URL form validation that renders error messages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to Jenkins Subversion Partial Release Manager Plugin version 1.0.2 or later which properly escapes error message output. If upgrade is not immediately possible, restrict access to Jenkins users with administrative privileges and avoid pasting untrusted URLs into the repository URL field.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-2199 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-2199 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data