Zap PipelineApplication · Jenkins

CVE-2020-2214

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-07-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.9 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jenkins ZAP Pipeline Plugin 1.9 and earlier programmatically disables Content-Security-Policy protection for user-generated content in workspaces, archived artifacts, etc. that Jenkins offers for download.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Jenkins ZAP Pipeline Plugin version 1.9 and earlier disables Content-Security-Policy protection headers that Jenkins normally applies to user-generated content served for download, including workspace files and archived artifacts. This removes a security safeguard that helps prevent XSS attacks when users download or view content that may contain malicious scripts.

MitigationUpgrade the Jenkins ZAP Pipeline Plugin to a version newer than 1.9. If immediate upgrade is not possible, consider restricting access to workspace downloads and archived artifacts or implementing additional controls on served content.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Zap PipelineApplication
Affected:<= 1.9

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Jenkins ZAP Pipeline Plugin is installed
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab, or use: jenkins-cli.jar who-am-i or API endpoint /pluginManager/api/json?tree=plugins[shortName,version] to list installed plugins. Look for 'zap-pipeline' or 'ZAP Pipeline' in the plugin list.
    Affected if The plugin named 'zap-pipeline' or 'ZAP Pipeline' appears in the installed plugins list
  2. Check the installed version number
    In the Manage Plugins > Installed view, locate the ZAP Pipeline Plugin and read the Version column. If using CLI/API, the version field is returned in the plugins JSON response.
    Affected if The version number is 1.9 or lower (for example: 1.9, 1.8, 1.7, etc.)
  3. Confirm CSP headers are missing from workspace file downloads
    Trigger a build that produces workspace files, then attempt to download a file from the workspace (JENKINS_URL/job/JOBNAME/ws/FILENAME). Use curl -I or browser DevTools to inspect the HTTP response headers for Content-Security-Policy. Alternatively, use Jenkins API: curl -s -D - -o /dev/null JENKINS_URL/job/JOBNAME/ws/yourfile
    Affected if The Content-Security-Policy header is absent from the HTTP response when downloading workspace files
  4. Confirm CSP headers are missing from archived artifact downloads
    Locate a build with archived artifacts, then download an artifact (JENKINS_URL/job/JOBName/BUILD_NUMBER/artifact/PATH). Inspect the response headers for Content-Security-Policy as in step 3.
    Affected if The Content-Security-Policy header is absent from the HTTP response when downloading archived artifacts

The environment is affected if the ZAP Pipeline Plugin version is 1.9 or lower AND CSP headers are missing from workspace file and artifact downloads.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.9
Interim mitigation

Upgrade the Jenkins ZAP Pipeline Plugin to a version newer than 1.9. If immediate upgrade is not possible, consider restricting access to workspace downloads and archived artifacts or implementing additional controls on served content.

Fix this in Zap Pipeline Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,060
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-2214 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-2214 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data