CVE-2020-22656
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Ruckus R310 10.5.1.0.199, Ruckus R500 10.5.1.0.199, Ruckus R600 10.5.1.0.199, Ruckus T300 10.5.1.0.199, Ruckus T301n 10.5.1.0.199, Ruckus T301s 10.5.1.0.199, SmartCell Gateway 200 (SCG200) before 3.6.2.0.795, SmartZone 100 (SZ-100) before 3.6.2.0.795, SmartZone 300 (SZ300) before 3.6.2.0.795, Virtual SmartZone (vSZ) before 3.6.2.0.795, ZoneDirector 1100 9.10.2.0.130, ZoneDirector 1200 10.2.1.0.218, ZoneDirector 3000 10.2.1.0.218, ZoneDirector 5000 10.0.1.0.151, a vulnerability allows attackers to make the Secure Boot in failed attempts state (rfwd).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysisA detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.5.1.0.199= 10.5.1.0.199= 10.5.1.0.199= 10.5.1.0.199= 10.5.1.0.199= 10.5.1.0.199< 3.6.2.0.795< 3.6.2.0.795CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.6.2.0.795
For SCG200/SZ-100/SZ300/vSZ: upgrade to firmware 3.6.2.0.795 or later. For R310/R500/R600/T300/T301n/T301s: upgrade to any version newer than 10.5.1.0.199. For ZoneDirector models: upgrade to respective fixed versions as listed in the security bulletin.
- 1. Identify the specific Ruckus device model (R310, R500, R600, T300, T301n, T301s, SCG200, SZ-100, or ZoneDirector variant) from the affected product list.
- 2. Access the device web interface or CLI using administrative credentials.
- 3. Navigate to the firmware upgrade section (typically under Administration > Firmware Upgrade or System > Maintenance).
- 4. Download the appropriate fixed firmware from the official Ruckus support portal: https://support.ruckuswireless.com/
- 5. For SCG200, SZ-100, SZ300, and vSZ devices: Upgrade to firmware version 3.6.2.0.795 or later.
- 6. For R310, R500, R600, T300, T301n, T301s: Upgrade to any firmware version newer than 10.5.1.0.199 that includes the security fix.
- 7. For ZoneDirector devices: Upgrade to the fixed versions mentioned in the security bulletin (ZD1100: 9.10.2.0.130 or later, ZD1200/ZD3000: 10.2.1.0.218 or later, ZD5000: 10.0.1.0.151 or later).
- 8. Verify the upgrade completed successfully and confirm Secure Boot is functioning properly.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-22656 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-22656 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data