Lockable ResourcesApplication · Jenkins

CVE-2020-2281

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-09-23
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.8 or later.
See remediation →
61/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Lockable Resources Plugin 2.8 and earlier allows attackers to reserve, unreserve, unlock, and reset resources.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Lockable Resources Plugin versions 2.8 and earlier allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized actions including reserving, unreserving, unlocking, and resetting lockable resources without the legitimate user's consent. The lack of proper CSRF token validation on state-changing endpoints enables attackers to trick authenticated users into triggering these actions via malicious web pages.

MitigationUpgrade the Lockable Resources Plugin to version 2.9 or later which includes CSRF protection tokens. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict Jenkins UI access to trusted networks and enforce session management policies.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Lockable ResourcesApplication
Affected:<= 2.8

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Jenkins is running
    Access the Jenkins dashboard or check the Jenkins service status via system commands
    Affected if Jenkins is running with the Lockable Resources plugin installed
  2. Confirm Lockable Resources plugin is installed
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed and search for 'Lockable Resources', or check the plugin directory for the lockable-resources plugin files
    Affected if The Lockable Resources plugin appears in the installed plugins list
  3. Check the installed plugin version
    In Jenkins, go to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed, find Lockable Resources, and note the version number; compare against the affected version range
    Affected if The installed version is 2.8 or earlier (any version <= 2.8)
  4. Identify if lockable resources are configured
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Lockable Resources or check the Jenkins configuration for any defined lockable resources
    Affected if One or more lockable resources are defined in Jenkins configuration
  5. Verify state-changing endpoints are accessible
    Inspect network requests or check the plugin's API endpoints (such as /lockable-resources/reserve, /unreserve, /unlock, /reset) that handle resource state changes; confirm these endpoints lack CSRF token validation
    Affected if The plugin's state-changing endpoints do not require valid CSRF tokens for requests

A user is affected if Jenkins is running the Lockable Resources plugin at version 2.8 or earlier and lockable resources are configured, as the lack of CSRF protection on resource management endpoints allows unauthorized state changes.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.8
Interim mitigation

Upgrade the Lockable Resources Plugin to version 2.9 or later which includes CSRF protection tokens. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict Jenkins UI access to trusted networks and enforce session management policies.

Fix this in Lockable Resources Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-2281 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-2281 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data