CVE-2020-24681
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in B&R Industrial Automation Automation Studio allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Automation Studio: from 4.6.0 through 4.6.X, from 4.7.0 before 4.7.7 SP, from 4.8.0 before 4.8.6 SP, from 4.9.0 before 4.9.4 SP.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAutomation Studio contains an incorrect permission assignment vulnerability where critical system resources have improper access controls, allowing a local attacker to escalate privileges by accessing or modifying resources they should not have permission to access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.0, < 4.7.7.74>= 4.8, < 4.8.6.30>= 4.9, < 4.9.4.92CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Automation Studio versionLocate the Automation Studio installation and retrieve its version number, typically found in the program properties, about dialog, or installation directoryAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: >= 4.0 and < 4.7.7.74; >= 4.8 and < 4.8.6.30; >= 4.9 and < 4.9.4.92
-
Verify if local user access controls existExamine the user accounts and group memberships on the system where Automation Studio is installed to determine what local access levels are presentAffected if Non-administrator users have local account access to the system where Automation Studio is installed
-
Inspect file system permissions on Automation Studio directoriesReview access control lists on the main Automation Studio installation folder and subdirectories, checking which users or groups have read, write, or execute permissionsAffected if Users with limited privileges (non-admin) can access or modify files or directories they should not have permission to access within the Automation Studio installation path
-
Check for unauthorized modification of system resourcesLook for evidence that local users without administrative rights have been able to modify configuration files, scripts, or critical resources within the Automation Studio environmentAffected if Users with lower privilege levels can alter resources that should be restricted to administrators or elevated accounts
A system is affected if it runs any vulnerable version of Automation Studio (4.0 through 4.7.7.73, 4.8 through 4.8.6.29, or 4.9 through 4.9.4.91) AND allows local users with limited privileges to access or modify resources they should not be able to reach.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.7.7.744.8.6.304.9.4.92
Upgrade Automation Studio to version 4.7.7 SP, 4.8.6 SP, 4.9.4 SP or later. Review and correct file system permissions on critical resources as a defensive measure.
Upgrade to Automation Studio 4.7.7.74+, 4.8.6.30+, or 4.9.4.92+ (or latest available version in your branch)
- Identify the current installed version of Automation Studio (Help > About in the application)
- Navigate to the B&R Automation Studio download page or contact B&R support to obtain the appropriate fixed version
- For version 4.7.x: Upgrade to version 4.7.7.74 or later
- For version 4.8.x: Upgrade to version 4.8.6.30 or later
- For version 4.9.x: Upgrade to version 4.9.4.92 or later
- Before upgrading, back up all Automation Studio projects and configurations
- Run the installer with administrator privileges
- Follow the on-screen installation wizard prompts
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-24681 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-24681 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data