CVE-2020-24686
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe vulnerabilities can be exploited to cause the web visualization component of the PLC to stop and not respond, leading to genuine users losing remote visibility of the PLC state. If a user attempts to login to the PLC while this vulnerability is exploited, the PLC will show an error state and refuse connections to Automation Builder. The execution of the PLC application is not affected by this vulnerability. This issue affects ABB AC500 V2 products with onboard Ethernet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a denial-of-service vulnerability affecting the web visualization component of ABB AC500 V2 PLCs with onboard Ethernet. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this to cause the web visualization to stop responding, resulting in loss of remote visibility for legitimate users. When users attempt to login during exploitation, the PLC enters an error state and refuses connections to Automation Builder, though the core PLC application execution remains unaffected.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify PLC model and firmware versionCheck the device label on the physical PLC unit, or query the PLC via Automation Builder or its management interface to confirm the model number (PM554, PM556, PM564, PM566, PM572, or PM573) and current firmware versionAffected if The device is any of these six models (PM554, PM556, PM564, PM566, PM572, PM573) regardless of firmware version, as all versions are affected
-
Confirm web visualization is enabledAccess the PLC configuration via Automation Builder and verify whether the web visualization component (web server feature) has been enabled in the project settings or PLC configurationAffected if Web visualization is enabled and the PLC's onboard Ethernet web interface is accessible on the network
-
Test web interface accessibilityAttempt to reach the PLC's web interface via HTTP/HTTPS from an authorized network segment using the PLC's IP address. Document whether the page loads, times out, or returns an errorAffected if The web interface fails to respond, returns connection errors, or shows an error state when legitimate users attempt to access it
-
Check for PLC error state via Automation BuilderConnect to the PLC using Automation Builder and observe the device status. Look for error indicators or connection refusal messages when attempting to establish a sessionAffected if Automation Builder reports the PLC is in an error state or refuses connection attempts, especially when the web interface is also unresponsive
If you have an ABB AC500 V2 PLC model PM554, PM556, PM564, PM566, PM572, or PM573 with web visualization enabled and the web interface is unresponsive or the PLC shows an error state to Automation Builder, your environment is likely affected by this CVE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataNetwork segmentation and firewall rules should be implemented to restrict unauthorized access to the PLC's web interface. Apply vendor firmware updates when available and monitor for unusual traffic patterns targeting the web visualization service.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-24686 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-24686 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data