CVE-2020-25010
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn arbitrary code execution vulnerability in Kyland KPS2204 6 Port Managed Din-Rail Programmable Serial Device Servers Software Version:R0002.P05 allows remote attackers to upload a malicious script file by constructing a POST type request and writing a payload in the request parameters as an instruction to write a file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Kyland KPS2204 serial device server running software version R0002.P05 contains an arbitrary code execution vulnerability where remote attackers can upload malicious script files by crafting POST requests with payloads written directly to file system parameters, achieving remote code execution on the device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= r0002.p05CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is Kyland KPS2204Access the device web interface or check the device label/metadata to verify the model number is KPS2204Affected if Device is not a Kyland KPS2204 unit
-
Check installed firmware versionLog into the device web management interface and navigate to the firmware/version information page, or use the device's CLI to query the firmware version using 'show version' or equivalent commandAffected if Firmware version is exactly R0002.P05
-
Verify web management interface is accessibleAttempt to access the device's HTTP/HTTPS management port from a network perspective - check if ports 80 or 443 are listening and reachableAffected if Web interface is exposed and reachable on the network
-
Check if remote management is enabledIn the device web interface, navigate to System Settings or Network Settings and verify whether remote/administrative access is permitted from external interfacesAffected if Remote management access is enabled on WAN or untrusted interfaces
You are affected if you have a Kyland KPS2204 device running firmware version R0002.P05 with its web management interface accessible to untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIf available, apply vendor-supplied firmware patches; otherwise, restrict network access to the device's management interface via firewall rules or network segmentation to prevent unauthorized POST requests.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-25010 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-25010 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data