CVE-2020-25180
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRockwell Automation ISaGRAF Runtime Versions 4.x and 5.x includes the functionality of setting a password that is required to execute privileged commands. The password value passed to ISaGRAF Runtime is the result of encryption performed with a fixed key value using the tiny encryption algorithm (TEA) on an entered or saved password. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could pass their own encrypted password to the ISaGRAF 5 Runtime, which may result in information disclosure on the device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe ISaGRAF Runtime uses TEA (tiny encryption algorithm) with a fixed key to encrypt passwords. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can bypass authentication by submitting their own TEA-encrypted password value, allowing execution of privileged commands and information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.4<= 2.7.1< 1.1.0< d6.1= 5.1= 5.2= 6.1= 6.3<= 11.06.21<= 11.06.12<= 10024CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Schneider Electric device modelLocate the device nameplate or check the system documentation to confirm the exact model (Epas Gtw, Easergy T300, Easergy C5, Micom C264, Pacis Gtw, Saitel Dp, Saitel Dr, or Scd2200)Affected if The device model matches one of the affected products listed in the CVE
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the device's web interface, console, or firmware management system and retrieve the current firmware version numberAffected if The firmware version falls within the affected ranges: Epas Gtw = 6.4; Easergy T300 <= 2.7.1; Easergy C5 < 1.1.0; Micom C264 < d6.1; Pacis Gtw = 5.1, 5.2, 6.1, or 6.3; Saitel Dp <= 11.06.21; Saitel Dr <= 11.06.12; Scd2200 <= 10024
-
Verify if ISaGRAF Runtime is installed and runningCheck the device's running processes, services, or installed software list for the ISaGRAF Runtime componentAffected if ISaGRAF Runtime is present on the device
-
Confirm network accessibility of the authentication interfaceCheck network configuration to determine if the device's management interface or authentication service is exposed to network access (local or remote)Affected if The authentication interface is accessible over the network (LAN or WAN)
-
Inspect for TEA-encrypted password storageReview configuration files, password databases, or credential storage on the device for evidence of TEA-encrypted passwords rather than hashed passwordsAffected if Passwords are stored using TEA encryption with a fixed key rather than secure hashing
A user is affected if they operate any of the listed Schneider Electric firmware versions with ISaGRAF Runtime enabled and the authentication interface is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data1.1.0
Replace reversible TEA encryption with proper password hashing (e.g., bcrypt, Argon2) or implement per-instance random encryption keys with secure key management. Consider network segmentation and disabling remote access if not required.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-25180 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-25180 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data