CVE-2020-25506
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedD-Link DNS-320 FW v2.06B01 Revision Ax is affected by command injection in the system_mgr.cgi component, which can lead to remote arbitrary code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe D-Link DNS-320 network attached storage device running firmware v2.06B01 contains a command injection vulnerability in the system_mgr.cgi web component. The vulnerability allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands through insufficient input validation, potentially executing them with root privileges on the underlying Linux-based firmware.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.06b01CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelAccess the device web interface or check the physical device label to confirm the model is D-Link DNS-320. Alternatively, check the DHCP lease table or network scan for the device's MAC OUI (D-Link) and hostname.Affected if Device model is not D-Link DNS-320
-
Check firmware versionLog into the device web interface and navigate to System > System Settings or similar. The firmware version is typically displayed on the status/dashboard page. For CLI access via SSH/Telnet, check the firmware version using the version command or cat /etc/version.Affected if Firmware version is exactly 2.06B01 (any Revision Ax)
-
Verify web management interface is enabledAttempt to access the device's HTTP (port 80) or HTTPS (port 443) management interface from a browser. Confirm the login page or system_mgr.cgi responds.Affected if Web interface returns a 200 OK response and presents the D-Link login or CGI endpoint
-
Confirm system_mgr.cgi is accessibleTry accessing http://[device-ip]/cgi-bin/system_mgr.cgi directly in a browser. A valid response indicates the CGI script is exposed.Affected if system_mgr.cgi endpoint responds without authentication error or 404
User is affected if they have a D-Link DNS-320 running firmware version 2.06B01 with the web management interface and system_mgr.cgi component accessible on the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware patches if available; if no patch exists, isolate the device on a restricted network segment or replace with a supported device. Implement web application firewall rules to detect and block suspicious requests to system_mgr.cgi.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,488.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-25506 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-25506 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data