CVE-2020-25655
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in ManagedClusterView API, that could allow secrets to be disclosed to users without the correct permissions. Views created for an admin user would be made available for a short time to users with only view permission. In this short time window the user with view permission could read cluster secrets that should only be disclosed to admin users.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe ManagedClusterView API had a time-of-check-to-time-of-use (TOCTOU) vulnerability where admin-created views remained accessible in a short-lived cache to users with only view permissions, allowing unauthorized disclosure of cluster secrets.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.0 is installedRun 'oc get csv -A | grep advanced-cluster-management' or check the operator catalog for the 'advanced-cluster-management' operator at version 2.0Affected if The product version shows 2.0 of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
-
Check for existing ManagedClusterView resourcesRun 'oc get managedclusterviews -A' to list any ManagedClusterView objects in the clusterAffected if ManagedClusterView resources exist in any namespace, indicating the vulnerable API is in use
-
Verify authorization policies for ManagedClusterView accessExamine ClusterRoleBindings and RoleBindings related to ManagedClusterView: run 'oc get clusterrolebinding -o wide' and check for roles granting 'get' or 'list' on 'managedclusterviews' to non-admin usersAffected if Users with only 'view' permissions on ManagedClusterView resources are able to list or get these resources
-
Test cache behavior with non-admin view userCreate a test user with only 'view' role in a namespace, then create a ManagedClusterView as an admin, then query that view as the test user to observe if cached admin views remain accessibleAffected if A user with only view permissions can retrieve a ManagedClusterView that was created by an admin user, indicating the TOCTOU cache vulnerability is present
A user is affected if they have RH ACM 2.0 installed with ManagedClusterView resources accessible to users with view-only permissions, allowing cached admin-created views to leak to non-admin users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch to ensure ManagedClusterView API properly invalidates and isolates admin views from non-admin users, with authorization checks enforced at every access point.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-25655 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-25655 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data