CVE-2020-26071
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco SD-WAN Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to create or overwrite arbitrary files on an affected device, which could result in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation for specific commands. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by including crafted arguments to those specific commands. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to create or overwrite arbitrary files on the affected device, which could result in a DoS condition.Cisco has released software updates that address this vulnerability. There are no workarounds that address this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis vulnerability in Cisco SD-WAN Software's CLI allows an authenticated local attacker to create or overwrite arbitrary files on affected devices due to insufficient input validation on specific commands. The attacker exploits the vulnerability by providing crafted arguments to these commands, potentially leading to denial of service. The vulnerability requires local access and valid authentication credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 17.2.4= 17.2.5= 17.2.6= 17.2.7= 17.2.8= 17.2.9= 17.2.10= 18.2.0= 18.3.0= 18.3.1= 18.3.1.1= 18.3.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco SD-WAN software installationLog into the device CLI and run the command 'show version' or 'show sdwan version' to identify the installed software. Look for 'Cisco SD-WAN' or 'Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager' in the output.Affected if The system is running Cisco SD-WAN Software (now known as Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager)
-
Check the installed software versionRun 'show version' or 'show sdwan version' and locate the software version number in the output. Compare it against the affected versions: 17.2.4, 17.2.5, 17.2.6, 17.2.7, 17.2.8, 17.2.9, 17.2.10, 18.2.0, 18.3.0, 18.3.1, 18.3.1.1, 18.3.3Affected if The installed version exactly matches one of the listed affected versions
-
Verify CLI access is availableConfirm that command-line interface access is enabled on the device by attempting to access the CLI or checking configuration with 'show configuration' or 'show running-config' commands.Affected if CLI access is enabled and accessible to local users
-
Confirm local authentication is configuredCheck for local user accounts on the device using 'show users' or by reviewing the authentication configuration. The vulnerability requires valid local credentials.Affected if Local user accounts or authentication methods are configured on the device
The environment is affected if the device runs Cisco SD-WAN Software version 17.2.4 through 18.3.3 (specifically any of the exact versions listed) and has CLI access with local authentication enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Cisco software updates that address this vulnerability; there are no available workarounds. Organizations should plan maintenance windows to test and deploy the vendor patch.
17.2.8 or later in the 17.2.x line, or a newer stable 17.x/18.x/20.x release as per Cisco's official fixed release notes
- 1. Back up the current Cisco SD-WAN Manager configuration and ensure you have a verified restore procedure.
- 2. Schedule a maintenance window as the upgrade may require device restarts.
- 3. Download the fixed software version from Cisco (refer to Cisco SD-WAN release notes for the specific build).
- 4. Upload the software image to the SD-WAN Manager via the administration interface or CLI.
- 5. Initiate the upgrade process using the `request software install` command or via the web UI.
- 6. Verify the upgrade completes successfully and the system is operational.
- 7. Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by checking the SD-WAN Manager version matches the fixed release.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-26071 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-26071 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data