Iot Field Network DirectorApplication · Cisco

CVE-2020-26075

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-11-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 4.6.1 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the REST API of Cisco IoT Field Network Director (FND) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to gain access to the back-end database of an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of REST API requests that are made to an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting malicious API requests to the affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain access to the back-end database of the affected device.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The vulnerability exists in the REST API of Cisco IoT Field Network Director where insufficient input validation of API requests allows an authenticated attacker to craft malicious requests that bypass normal access controls and gain direct access to the back-end database of the affected device.

MitigationApply the vendor patch or updated version of Cisco IoT FND. Until patched, restrict API access to trusted IP addresses only and monitor for anomalous API activity patterns.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Iot Field Network DirectorApplication
Affected:< 4.6.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Cisco IoT Field Network Director is installed
    Check for the presence of Cisco IoT FND processes or installation directories on the system. Look for processes named 'fndservice', 'iotfnd', or similar, and check common installation paths such as /opt/cisco/iot-fnd or C:\Program Files\Cisco\IoT FND
    Affected if The software is installed and running on the system
  2. Determine the installed version of Cisco IoT FND
    Check the installed version by inspecting the application itself. Common methods include: checking the About page in the web interface, reviewing version files in the installation directory, or querying the system package manager if available. Compare your version to the affected range of versions prior to 4.6.1
    Affected if The installed version is any version prior to 4.6.1 (for example, 4.6.0, 4.5.x, 4.4.x, etc.)
  3. Confirm the REST API is enabled
    Check if the REST API functionality is accessible on the device. This can be done by attempting to reach common API endpoints such as /api/fnd/v1/ or /rest/api/ on the IoT FND host, or by reviewing the configuration for API-enabled services
    Affected if The REST API is exposed and accessible on the network
  4. Review API access logs for anomalous requests
    Examine the Cisco IoT FND logs for signs of unusual API activity, particularly requests that may indicate database enumeration or access attempts. Look for API calls with unusual query patterns, unexpected database table references, or elevated frequency of API requests from authenticated sessions
    Affected if Logs show API requests with suspicious patterns that suggest exploitation of access control bypass

You are affected if Cisco IoT FND is installed with a version prior to 4.6.1 and the REST API is enabled and accessible on your network.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 4.6.1 or later
Fixed in 4.6.1
Interim mitigation

Apply the vendor patch or updated version of Cisco IoT FND. Until patched, restrict API access to trusted IP addresses only and monitor for anomalous API activity patterns.

Fix this in Iot Field Network Director Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-26075 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-26075 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data