CVE-2020-27220
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Eclipse Hono AMQP and MQTT protocol adapters do not check whether an authenticated gateway device is authorized to receive command & control messages when it has subscribed only to commands for a specific device. The missing check involves verifying that the command target device is configured giving permission for the gateway device to act on its behalf. This means an authenticated device of a certain tenant, notably also a non-gateway device acting like a gateway, may receive command & control messages targeted at a different device of the same tenant without corresponding permissions getting checked.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceEclipse Hono's AMQP and MQTT protocol adapters fail to verify that an authenticated gateway has explicit permission from a target device before forwarding command & control messages to it. When a gateway subscribes to commands for a specific device, the adapters do not check if that target device has authorized the gateway to act on its behalf, allowing any authenticated device within a tenant to intercept commands intended for other devices.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.4.0, <= 1.4.4= 1.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Eclipse Hono installation versionCheck the version of your deployed Eclipse Hono instance through container image tags, Helm chart version, pod labels, or application startup logs. Common methods include: 'kubectl get pods -n hono -o jsonpath={.items[*].spec.containers[*].image}' for Kubernetes, or 'docker images' for Docker deployments.Affected if The installed version is 1.4.0 through 1.4.4 inclusive, or exactly 1.5.0
-
Confirm AMQP protocol adapter is deployed and activeVerify that the AMQP protocol adapter component is running in your environment. Check for AMQP adapter pods, services, or containers in your Eclipse Hono deployment.Affected if The AMQP adapter is running and the Hono version falls within the affected range (1.4.0-1.4.4 or 1.5.0)
-
Confirm MQTT protocol adapter is deployed and activeVerify that the MQTT protocol adapter component is running in your environment. Check for MQTT adapter pods, services, or containers in your Eclipse Hono deployment.Affected if The MQTT adapter is running and the Hono version falls within the affected range (1.4.0-1.4.4 or 1.5.0)
-
Check gateway command subscription authorization configurationInspect the adapter configuration for authorization policies governing gateway-to-device command routing. Look for configuration settings that control whether gateways require explicit target device authorization before receiving commands. The specific configuration location depends on your deployment method (config maps, properties files, or environment variables).Affected if The authorization check for gateway command subscriptions is disabled, missing, or set to permissive mode, and the Hono version is within the affected range
You are affected if your Eclipse Hono version is 1.4.0 through 1.4.4 or exactly 1.5.0, and you use either the AMQP or MQTT protocol adapter with gateway devices that can subscribe to commands for other devices.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement authorization verification in the AMQP and MQTT protocol adapters to confirm the target device has granted the gateway permission before forwarding command messages, ensuring proper permission validation occurs during the subscription and command routing process.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $15,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-27220 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-27220 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data