Vital Signs Monitor Vc150 FirmwareOperating system · Innokasmedical

CVE-2020-27260

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-01-08
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.7.15 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Innokas Yhtymä Oy Vital Signs Monitor VC150 prior to Version 1.7.15 HL7 v2.x injection vulnerabilities exist in the affected products that allow physically proximate attackers with a connected barcode reader to inject HL7 v2.x segments into specific HL7 v2.x messages via multiple expected parameters.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Innokas Vital Signs Monitor VC150 versions prior to 1.7.15 contain HL7 v2.x injection vulnerabilities allowing a physically proximate attacker with a connected barcode reader to inject arbitrary HL7 v2.x segments into specific HL7 v2.x messages through multiple expected input parameters.

MitigationUpgrade Innokas VC150 Vital Signs Monitor to version 1.7.15 or later to remediate the HL7 v2.x injection vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Vital Signs Monitor Vc150 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:< 1.7.15

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Physical
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm the device model
    Identify if the target device is an Innokasmedical Vital Signs Monitor VC150. This is typically visible on the device physical label, startup screen, or management interface.
    Affected if The device is not an Innokas VC150 model - this CVE only applies to that specific product.
  2. Determine the installed firmware version
    Access the device system information or firmware version menu, typically found in the device settings, service mode, or system diagnostics screen. Compare the displayed firmware version to the affected range of < 1.7.15.
    Affected if The firmware version is lower than 1.7.15 (for example, 1.7.10, 1.6.8, etc.).
  3. Check if HL7 v2.x interface is enabled
    Examine the device configuration or integration settings to verify whether HL7 v2.x message exchange is configured and active on the device.
    Affected if HL7 v2.x interface is enabled and configured for data exchange.
  4. Verify barcode reader connectivity
    Inspect the device physical ports and configuration settings to determine if a barcode reader is connected or configured as an input method for patient/data entry.
    Affected if A barcode reader is connected to the device and enabled as an input interface.
  5. Assess physical access exposure
    Evaluate whether the device is located in an area where an unauthorized individual could physically access it with a barcode reader, considering the attack requires physical proximity.
    Affected if The device is in an area with uncontrolled physical access where an attacker could connect a barcode reader.

A user is affected if they have an Innokas VC150 device with firmware version below 1.7.15 that has both HL7 v2.x enabled and a barcode reader connected, in a physically accessible location.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.7.15 or later
Fixed in 1.7.15
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Innokas VC150 Vital Signs Monitor to version 1.7.15 or later to remediate the HL7 v2.x injection vulnerability.

Fix this in Vital Signs Monitor Vc150 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-27260 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-27260 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data