CVE-2020-27832
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in Red Hat Quay, where it has a persistent Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability when displaying a repository's notification. This flaw allows an attacker to trick a user into performing a malicious action to impersonate the target user. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA persistent (stored) Cross-site Scripting vulnerability exists in Red Hat Quay's repository notification display functionality. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript into repository notifications that get stored on the server and execute when other users view those notifications, enabling session hijacking and user impersonation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.0.0, < 3.3.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Quay installation versionCheck the Quay container image tag or version metadata: `podman images | grep quay` or inspect the container config for version info. If using the Quay Operator, check the CustomResource definition for the version field.Affected if The installed version falls within >= 3.0.0 and < 3.3.2.
-
Confirm repository notifications are enabledExamine the Quay config.yaml file (typically mounted at `/quay-registry/conf` in the container) for the `FEATURE_REPO_NOTIFICATIONS` setting or check via the Management Console under Repository Settings.Affected if Notifications feature is set to 'true' or enabled in the configuration.
-
Verify notification creation permissionsReview the organization/team membership settings to determine which users can create repository notifications. Access the Quay UI, navigate to an organization's repository settings, and inspect the 'Notifications' section permissions.Affected if Users other than admin users have permission to create repository notifications.
-
Inspect existing notifications for payload presenceQuery the database backing Quay (PostgreSQL) for the notifications table, or use the Quay API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repository/{namespace}/{repo}/notifications` to list stored notifications and inspect their content for unsanitized input.Affected if Malicious JavaScript payloads are found stored in notification entries.
You are affected if Quay version is between 3.0.0 and 3.3.2 AND repository notifications feature is enabled, allowing low-privilege users to inject and store malicious scripts in notification entries that execute when viewed by other users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.3.2
Update to the patched version of Red Hat Quay. As an immediate workaround, implement output encoding/sanitization on all notification display paths and restrict notification creation permissions until the patch is applied.
Quay 3.3.2 or later
- Identify your current Quay version using `docker ps` or your container orchestration tool
- Backup your Quay configuration and database before upgrading
- Upgrade Quay to version 3.3.2 or later following your deployment method (e.g., `docker pull quay.io/quay/quay:v3.3.2` or via operator)
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the Quay UI and ensuring services are running
- Test that repository notifications are rendered properly without XSS execution
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-27832 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-27832 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data