Openshift Container PlatformApplication · Redhat

CVE-2020-27833

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-05-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.7 or later.
See remediation →
75/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Zip Slip vulnerability was found in the oc binary in openshift-clients where an arbitrary file write is achieved by using a specially crafted raw container image (.tar file) which contains symbolic links. The vulnerability is limited to the command `oc image extract`. If a symbolic link is first created pointing within the tarball, this allows further symbolic links to bypass the existing path check. This flaw allows the tarball to create links outside the tarball's parent directory, allowing for executables or configuration files to be overwritten, resulting in arbitrary code execution. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality, integrity, as well as system availability. Versions up to and including openshift-clients-4.7.0-202104250659.p0.git.95881af are affected.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A Zip Slip vulnerability exists in the OpenShift CLI (oc) binary's `oc image extract` command. Attackers can craft malicious .tar container images containing symbolic links that first point within the tarball, then bypass path validation to create symbolic links pointing outside the extraction directory. This allows overwriting system executables or configuration files, leading to arbitrary code execution.

MitigationUpdate openshift-clients to a version newer than 4.7.0-202104250659.p0.git.95881af. Additionally, avoid extracting container images from untrusted sources using `oc image extract`.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Openshift Container PlatformApplication
Affected:<= 4.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify oc client is installed
    Run `oc version` or check if the oc binary exists in your PATH using `which oc`
    Affected if The oc command is not found or returns an error, meaning the client is not installed and this vulnerability does not apply
  2. Determine oc client version
    Run `oc version --client` to display the installed OpenShift CLI version
    Affected if The displayed version is earlier than or equal to 4.7 (specifically <= 4.7.0-202104250659.p0.git.95881af), indicating the vulnerable version is in use
  3. Identify use of oc image extract command
    Search your scripts, automation, CI/CD pipelines, and documentation for usage of the `oc image extract` command using grep or file search tools
    Affected if The `oc image extract` command is actively used in your environment, enabling the vulnerable code path
  4. Assess source of extracted container images
    Review which container image sources (registries) are being used with `oc image extract`, checking if they include untrusted or third-party registries
    Affected if You extract container images from untrusted or unverified sources, increasing the risk that a malicious tar archive could be processed

You are affected if you run oc client version 4.7 or earlier AND use the `oc image extract` command, particularly on images from untrusted sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.7
Interim mitigation

Update openshift-clients to a version newer than 4.7.0-202104250659.p0.git.95881af. Additionally, avoid extracting container images from untrusted sources using `oc image extract`.

Fix this in Openshift Container Platform Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-27833 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-27833 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data