CVE-2020-27890
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Zigbee protocol implementation on Texas Instruments CC2538 devices with Z-Stack 3.0.1 does not properly process a ZCL Write Attributes No Response message. It crashes in zclParseInWriteCmd() and does not update the specific attribute's value.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Zigbee Z-Stack 3.0.1 on Texas Instruments CC2538 devices contains a vulnerability in the zclParseInWriteCmd() function. When processing a specially crafted ZCL Write Attributes No Response message, the device crashes (denial of service) and fails to update the targeted attribute value. This is a parsing logic flaw in the Zigbee cluster library handling write attribute commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the hardware platformCheck if the Zigbee device is based on the Texas Instruments CC2538 system-on-chip. This may be documented in device specifications, firmware build information, or by inspecting the hardware itself for TI CC2538 markings.Affected if The device uses TI CC2538 hardware - only this platform is affected by this CVE.
-
Determine the Z-Stack firmware versionQuery the device firmware metadata or check the Z-Stack version string. On TI CC2538 devices, this can often be retrieved via debug interfaces, firmware metadata, or by querying the device's Z-Stack version attribute if exposed through ZCL device information cluster.Affected if The installed Z-Stack version is exactly 3.0.1 - this is the only version listed as affected.
-
Verify ZCL write attribute processing is enabledConfirm that the device has an active Zigbee endpoint implementing ZCL (Zigbee Cluster Library) with write attribute functionality. This is standard on most Zigbee devices but can be verified by checking the device's cluster configuration or monitoring Zigbee traffic for Write Attributes or Write Attributes No Response commands.Affected if The device processes incoming ZCL Write Attributes No Response commands - this is the attack vector for triggering the vulnerability.
-
Monitor for attribute update failuresAttempt to send a legitimate ZCL Write Attributes No Response command to the device and verify whether the targeted attribute value is updated correctly. Alternatively, review device logs or network captures for evidence of failed attribute writes or unexpected device behavior.Affected if The Write Attributes No Response command fails to update the targeted attribute value while other write commands succeed - this indicates the parsing flaw may be present.
-
Check for device crashes or resetsMonitor the device for unexpected resets, crashes, or denial of service conditions, particularly after processing Zigbee traffic containing ZCL write attribute commands. Review device logs, uptime statistics, or network monitoring for crash indicators.Affected if The device crashes or becomes unresponsive specifically when processing ZCL Write Attributes No Response messages - this confirms the vulnerability is present and triggerable.
A device is affected if it uses TI CC2538 hardware running Z-Stack version 3.0.1 and processes ZCL Write Attributes No Response commands, as the parsing flaw causes attribute update failures and potential device crashes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched Z-Stack version from Texas Instruments, or if unavailable, implement network-level controls to filter unauthorized Zigbee traffic targeting ZCL write attribute commands.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-27890 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-27890 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data