CVE-2020-28014
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedExim 4 before 4.94.2 allows Execution with Unnecessary Privileges. The -oP option is available to the exim user, and allows a denial of service because root-owned files can be overwritten.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceExim versions before 4.94.2 allow the unprivileged exim user to invoke the -oP (preserve file permissions) option, which should require root privileges. This misconfiguration permits the exim user to overwrite root-owned files, enabling denial of service by corrupting critical system files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.00, < 4.94.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Exim versionRun 'exim --version' or check the package manager (dpkg -l exim, rpm -q exim)Affected if The version is 4.00 or higher but lower than 4.94.2
-
Confirm Exim daemon runs as unprivileged userCheck /etc/exim/exim.conf or run 'ps aux | grep exim' to see the user the exim daemon runs asAffected if Exim runs as a non-root user (commonly 'exim' or 'mail') and the version is in the affected range
-
Test -oP option accessibility for exim userAs the exim user (or via sudo -u exim), attempt to run 'exim -oP' and observe if the command is accepted without privilege errorAffected if The -oP flag is accepted without requiring root privileges, indicating the vulnerable configuration
-
Verify file permissions on critical system filesCheck ownership of key system files (e.g., /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, /bin/*, /sbin/*) that the exim user could overwrite if -oP is exploitedAffected if Root-owned system files exist that the exim user has write access to via the -oP vulnerability
The environment is affected if Exim version 4.00 through 4.94.2 is installed and the -oP flag can be invoked by the unprivileged exim user without proper privilege restrictions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data4.94.2
Upgrade Exim to version 4.94.2 or later to obtain the patched binary that restricts -oP usage to privileged users only.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-28014 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-28014 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data