MergeApplication · Merge Project

CVE-2020-28499

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-02-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.1.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
All versions of package merge are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution via _recursiveMerge .

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The 'merge' npm package versions contain a prototype pollution vulnerability in the _recursiveMerge function. Attackers can manipulate the __proto__ or constructor properties during object merging operations, potentially gaining control over the object's prototype chain and executing arbitrary code or causing denial of service.

MitigationUpdate the merge package to a patched version if available, or implement input sanitization to filter out __proto__ and constructor properties before passing objects to merge functions. Consider migrating to a safer alternative if no patch is provided.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
MergeApplication
Affected:< 2.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify merge package installation
    Run 'npm list merge' in your project root to list the merge package and its version
    Affected if The merge package is installed with a version less than 2.1.1
  2. Verify the installed version against the vulnerable range
    Check the version output from npm list or inspect package.json and package-lock.json for the merge entry
    Affected if The installed version is less than 2.1.1 (e.g., 2.1.0, 2.0.0, 1.x.x, etc.)
  3. Locate code that imports or requires merge
    Search your codebase for require('merge') or import statements referencing the merge package, and review where merge functions are invoked
    Affected if Your codebase imports and calls functions from the merge package (such as merge(), merge.recursive(), or object merging utilities)
  4. Determine if user-controlled input reaches merge operations
    Trace data flow from request parameters, API inputs, or file uploads to merge function calls. Inspect the objects passed as arguments to merge
    Affected if Untrusted or user-supplied data (especially objects with __proto__ or constructor properties) can be passed directly to merge functions without prior sanitization

You are affected if the merge npm package version is below 2.1.1 AND your code uses merge functions with objects that may contain __proto__ or constructor properties from untrusted sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.1.1 or later
Fixed in 2.1.1
Interim mitigation

Update the merge package to a patched version if available, or implement input sanitization to filter out __proto__ and constructor properties before passing objects to merge functions. Consider migrating to a safer alternative if no patch is provided.

Recommended fix High confidence

2.1.1 or later

  1. Identify the merge package version in your project (check package.json or package-lock.json)
  2. Run the appropriate package manager upgrade command to update merge to version 2.1.1 or later (e.g., npm install merge@^2.1.1, yarn upgrade merge@^2.1.1, or pnpm update merge)
  3. Verify the installed version meets the minimum requirement of 2.1.1
  4. Rebuild and test your application to ensure functionality is intact

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Merge Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-28499 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-28499 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data