CVE-2020-28949
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedArchive_Tar through 1.4.10 has :// filename sanitization only to address phar attacks, and thus any other stream-wrapper attack (such as file:// to overwrite files) can still succeed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceArchive_Tar through 1.4.10 performed incomplete filename sanitization that only addressed phar:// stream wrappers to prevent PHP object injection attacks. The library failed to sanitize other dangerous stream wrappers such as file://, allowing crafted malicious tar archives to overwrite arbitrary files on the server when extracted.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.4.12= 9.0= 10.0= 32= 33= 34= 35>= 7.0, < 7.75>= 8.0.0, < 8.9.10>= 8.8.0, < 8.8.12>= 9.0.0, < 9.0.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Archive_Tar PHP library versionRun 'composer show pear/archive_tar' or inspect the file PEAR/Archive/Tar.php and look for the version constant at the top of the fileAffected if The version is less than 1.4.12 (or if no version is displayed and the file date is older than November 2020)
-
Identify if Drupal uses Archive_TarCheck if the Drupal site uses the tar library: look for the 'tar' library in Drupal's /libraries directory, or run 'drush pm:list' to see if Archive_Tar is a dependencyAffected if Drupal is installed and relies on an unpatched Archive_Tar version below 1.4.12
-
Determine Drupal core versionRun 'drush status' or inspect the file CHANGELOG.txt in the Drupal root directoryAffected if Drupal version is 7.0-7.74, 8.0.0-8.9.9, 8.8.0-8.8.11, or 9.0.0-9.0.8
-
Check OS version on Debian or FedoraRun 'cat /etc/debian_version' for Debian or 'cat /etc/fedora-release' for FedoraAffected if The OS is Debian 9.0 or 10.0, or Fedora 32, 33, 34, or 35
-
Verify if application processes untrusted tar archivesReview application code that calls Archive_Tar::extract() or similar extraction methods, checking if the tar input originates from untrusted sources (user uploads, external APIs, network sources)Affected if The application extracts tar archives from untrusted sources using the vulnerable Archive_Tar library
You are affected if your system uses Archive_Tar below version 1.4.12 AND processes tar archives from untrusted sources, particularly on the listed Drupal or OS versions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.4.127.758.8.12
Upgrade Archive_Tar to version 1.4.14 or later which implements comprehensive stream wrapper sanitization. As a temporary measure, validate all extracted file paths at the application layer before extraction.
Archive_Tar >= 1.4.12 (or Drupal 7.75+/8.8.12+/8.9.10+/9.0.9+)
- 1. Identify the application or dependency that uses the Archive_Tar PEAR package
- 2. For PHP/PEAR environments: Run 'pear upgrade Archive_Tar' or use composer to update the pear/archive_tar package to version 1.4.12 or later
- 3. For Drupal 7.x: Upgrade to Drupal 7.75 or later
- 4. For Drupal 8.8.x: Upgrade to Drupal 8.8.12 or later
- 5. For Drupal 8.9.x: Upgrade to Drupal 8.9.10 or later
- 6. For Drupal 9.0.x: Upgrade to Drupal 9.0.9 or later
- 7. Verify the installed Archive_Tar version matches or exceeds 1.4.12 using 'pear list Archive_Tar' or checking composer.lock
- 8. Test the application functionality to ensure the upgrade does not break existing tar extraction operations
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-28949 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-28949 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data