Elixir Alpine Docker ImageApplication · Docker

CVE-2020-29575

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-12-08
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.8.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The official elixir Docker images before 1.8.0-alpine (Alpine specific) contain a blank password for a root user. Systems using the elixir Linux Docker container deployed by affected versions of the Docker image may allow a remote attacker to achieve root access with a blank password.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The official Elixir Docker Alpine Linux images prior to version 1.8.0 contain a misconfiguration that sets a blank (empty) password for the root user. This creates an authentication backdoor allowing remote attackers to gain root-level container access through any service accepting password authentication.

MitigationUpgrade the Elixir Docker image to version 1.8.0-alpine or later in all deployment configurations (Dockerfiles, docker-compose files, Kubernetes manifests, CI/CD pipelines).

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Elixir Alpine Docker ImageApplication
Affected:< 1.8.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Elixir Alpine image usage in Dockerfiles
    Search all Dockerfiles in your codebase for lines containing 'elixir' and 'alpine' (e.g., 'FROM elixir:alpine' or 'FROM hexpm/elixir:alpine')
    Affected if The image tag specifies a version lower than 1.8.0 (e.g., 1.7.0-alpine, 1.6.0-alpine, or any alpine tag without a version number pointing to a release before 1.8.0)
  2. Identify Elixir Alpine image usage in docker-compose files
    Search all docker-compose.yml files for elixir alpine image references and extract the tag
    Affected if The image tag shows a version lower than 1.8.0-alpine
  3. Identify Elixir Alpine image usage in Kubernetes manifests
    Search all Kubernetes YAML files (Deployments, Pods, StatefulSets) for container images using elixir alpine
    Affected if The image specification shows a version lower than 1.8.0-alpine
  4. Check running containers for vulnerable Elixir Alpine images
    Run 'docker ps --format "{{.Image}}"' to list all running container images, then filter for elixir alpine variants
    Affected if Any running container shows an elixir alpine image with version tag below 1.8.0
  5. Verify root password configuration in the image
    If you have access to the container, inspect /etc/shadow for the root user entry; a blank password hash (e.g., root::) indicates the vulnerability
    Affected if The root user account has an empty password field in /etc/shadow

You are affected if any deployment in your environment uses an official Elixir Alpine Docker image with version tag lower than 1.8.0-alpine.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.8.0 or later
Fixed in 1.8.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade the Elixir Docker image to version 1.8.0-alpine or later in all deployment configurations (Dockerfiles, docker-compose files, Kubernetes manifests, CI/CD pipelines).

Recommended fix High confidence

elixir:1.8.0-alpine or later

  1. Update your Docker Compose files, Kubernetes manifests, or container deployment configurations to specify the fixed image version
  2. Pull the patched image: docker pull elixir:1.8.0-alpine (or a later version such as 1.8.1-alpine, 1.9-alpine, etc.)
  3. Rebuild and redeploy all containers using the updated Elixir Alpine Docker image
  4. Verify the root user no longer has a blank password by inspecting the image or attempting authenticated access

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Elixir Alpine Docker Image Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-29575 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-29575 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data